Cited by 70Anatomy and Medical TechnologyMedical and Biological SciencesInnovations in Medical Education

Professionalism and anatomy: how do these two terms define our role?

Open access
Pawlina, Wojciech·2006·Clinical Anatomy

Abstract

CLINICAL ANATOMY is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of CLINICAL ANATOMY is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. CLINICAL ANATOMY publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ca.20329

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dissection room and interaction with human donors provide unique contributions to the development of healthcare professionals, including nontechnical, discipline-independent skills (empathy, communication, teamwork, humanistic values) and professional identity formation, that are best learned through in-person experiences.

    “There are contributions to the development of healthcare professionals that are best learned by in-person experiences, allowing individuals to develop and mature their professional identity.These include the acquisition of many nontechnical, discipline-independent skills such as empathy, communication, teamwork, humanistic values, and professional identity formation (Rizzolo, 2002;Escobar-Poni & P”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pawlina, W.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Pawlina, Wojciech
Venue
Clinical Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05-08
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
391-392
ISSN
  • 0897-3806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2353
OpenAlex
W1979294053
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
professionalism, clinical anatomy education
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Periodicals as Topic, Professional Competence, PubMed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review