The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetic resonance elastography: A review
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a rapidly developing technology for quantitatively assessing the mechanical properties of tissue. The technology can be considered to be an imaging‐based counterpart to palpation, commonly used by physicians to diagnose and characterize diseases. The success of palpation as a diagnostic method is based on the fact that the mechanical properties of tissues are often dramatically affected by the presence of disease processes, such as cancer, inflammation, and fibrosis. MRE obtains information about the stiffness of tissue by assessing the propagation of mechanical waves through the tissue with a special magnetic resonance imaging technique. The technique essentially involves three steps: (1) generating shear waves in the tissue, (2) acquiring MR images depicting the propagation of the induced shear waves, and (3) processing the images of the shear waves to generate quantitative maps of tissue stiffness, called elastograms. MRE is already being used clinically for the assessment of patients with chronic liver diseases and is emerging as a safe, reliable, and noninvasive alternative to liver biopsy for staging hepatic fibrosis. MRE is also being investigated for application to pathologies of other organs including the brain, breast, blood vessels, heart, kidneys, lungs, and skeletal muscle. The purpose of this review article is to introduce this technology to clinical anatomists and to summarize some of the current clinical applications that are being pursued. Clin. Anat. 23:497–511, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography
Ozturk, A., Olson, M. C., Samir, A. E., & Venkatesh, S. K. (2021) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-021-03269-4 · Cited by 168
Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers
Shi, Y., Glaser, K. J., Venkatesh, S. K., Ben‐Abraham, E. I., & Ehman, R. L. (2015) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.24572 · Cited by 128
Self-citationHiscox, L. V., Johnson, C. L., McGarry, M. D. J., Perrins, M., Littlejohn, A., van Beek, E. J. R., Roberts, N., & Starr, J. M. (2018) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.010 · Cited by 118
Le Bihan, D., Ichikawa, S., & Motosugi, U. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170025 · Cited by 102
Image-Based Predictive Modeling of Heart Mechanics
Wang, V. Y., Nielsen, P. M. F., & Nash, M. P. (2015) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040609 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Mariappan, Y. K., Glaser, K. J., & Ehman, R. L.
- Venue
- Clinical Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 497-511
- ISSN
- 0897-3806 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2353
- OpenAlex
- W2036291324
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic resonance elastography: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ca.21006
- The paper
- Mariappan, Y. K., Glaser, K. J., & Ehman, R. L. (2010). Magnetic resonance elastography: A review. Clinical Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.