Cited by 181Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerCaveolin-1 and cellular processes

Activation of Piezo1 contributes to matrix stiffness‐induced angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma

Open access
Li, Miao, Zhang, Xi, Wang, Mimi, Wang, Yaohui, Qian, Jiali, Xing, Xiaoxia, Wang, Zhiming, You, Yang +8 more·2022·Cancer Communications

Abstract

Background: Despite integrin being highlighted as a stiffness‐sensor molecule in matrix stiffness‐driven angiogenesis, other stiffness‐sensor molecules and their mechanosensory pathways related to angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain obscure. Here, we explored the interplay between Piezo1 and integrin β1 in the mechanosensory pathway and their effects on HCC angiogenesis to better understand matrix stiffness‐induced angiogenesis. Methods: The role of Piezo1 in matrix stiffness‐induced angiogenesis was investigated using orthotopic liver cancer SD rat models with high liver stiffness background, and its clinical significance was evaluated in human HCC tissues. Matrix stiffness‐mediated Piezo1 upregulation and activation were assayed using an in vitro fibronectin (FN)‐coated cell culture system with different stiffness, Western blotting and Ca 2+ probe. The effects of shPiezo1‐conditioned medium (CM) on angiogenesis were examined by tube formation assay, wound healing assay and angiogenesis array. The underlying mechanism by which Piezo1 participated in matrix stiffness‐induced angiogenesis was analyzed by microRNA quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR), matrix stiffness measurement, dual‐luciferase reporter assay, ubiquitination assay and co‐immunoprecipitation. Results: Increased matrix stiffness significantly upregulated Piezo1 expression at both cellular and tissue levels, and high expression of Piezo1 indicated an unfavorable prognosis. High matrix stiffness also noticeably enhanced the activation level of Piezo1, similar to its expression level. Piezo1 knockdown significantly suppressed tumor growth, angiogenesis, and lung metastasis of HCC rat models with high liver stiffness background. shPiezo1‐CM from HCC cells attenuated tube formation and migration abilities of vascular endothelial cells remarkably, and analysis of differentially expressed pro‐angiogenic factors revealed that Piezo1 promoted the expression and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CXC chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL16) and insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2). Matrix stiffness‐caused Piezo1 upregulation/activation restrained hypoxia inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) ubiquitination, subsequently enhanced the expression of downstream pro‐angiogenic factors to accelerate HCC angiogenesis. Besides, collagen 1 (COL1)‐reinforced tissue stiffening resulted in more expression of Piezo1 via miR‐625‐5p. Conclusions: This study unravels a new mechanism by which the integrin β1/Piezo1 activation/Ca 2+ influx/HIF‐1α ubiquitination/VEGF, CXCL16 and IGFBP2 pathway participates in matrix stiffness‐driven HCC angiogenesis. Simultaneously, a positive feedback regulation loop as stiff matrix/integrin β1/miR‐625‐5p/Piezo1 and COL1/stiffer matrix mediates matrix stiffness‐caused Piezo1 upregulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cac2.12364

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a Ca2+ influx channel that responds to mechanical stress, Piezo1 mediates a series of fibroblast movements upon activation, thereby forming a positive feedback loop that contributes to progression of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

    “In summary, as a Ca2+ influx channel that responds to mechanical stress, Piezo1 mediates a series of fibroblast movements upon activation, thereby forming a positive feedback loop that contributes to the progression of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.91”

    From Mechanosensitive calcium ion channels Piezo1: A therapeutic target in liver disease (2025) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results section ('Piezo1 activation and Ca2+ influx in HCC cells'; page unavailable) reports mechanically stimulated Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ influx. Another Results section ('A positive feedback loop worked in matrix stiffness-mediated Piezo1 upregulation'; page unavailable) proposes a Piezo1–collagen–stiffness feedback loop in hepatocellular carcinoma. These passages do not establish fibroblast movements or progression of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a high-stiffness Sprague Dawley rat orthotopic liver cancer model, a positive feedback loop involving stiff matrix/integrin β1/miR-625-5p/Piezo1 and COL1/stiffer matrix mediates upregulation of Piezo1 expression by matrix stiffness.

    “Furthermore, in a high-stiffness Sprague Dawley (SD) rat orthotopic liver cancer model, a positive feedback regulatory loop involving stiff matrix/integrin β1/miR-625-5p/Piezo1 and COL1/stiffer matrix mediates the upregulation of Piezo1 expression by matrix stiffness.91”

    From Mechanosensitive calcium ion channels Piezo1: A therapeutic target in liver disease (2025) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results section, “A positive feedback loop worked in matrix stiffness-mediated Piezo1 upregulation” (page unavailable), proposes the stated integrin β1/miR-625-5p/Piezo1/COL1 loop based on HCC-cell and substrate-gel experiments. The paper also reports a high-stiffness orthotopic liver cancer SD rat model in “Piezo1 participated in matrix stiffness-induced angiogenesis and metastasis” (page unavailable), but does not establish the full feedback loop in that rat model. The claim therefore overstates the setting in which the loop was shown. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Matrix stiffness enhances Piezo1 activation and Ca2+ influx, which inhibits HIF-1α ubiquitination, facilitating expression of pro-angiogenic factors VEGF, CXCL16, IGFBP2, accelerating liver cancer angiogenesis.

    “Li et al. demonstrated that the initial factor of matrix stiffness enhances the activation of Piezo1 and the influx of Ca2+, which in turn inhibits the ubiquitination of HIF-1α, thereby facilitating the expression of pro-angiogenic factors VEGF, CXCL16, and IGFBP2, ultimately accelerating liver cancer angiogenesis.91”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. [1]Fidler IJ. Angiogenesis and cancer metastasis. Cancer J. 2000; 6 Suppl 2: S134‐ 41. 10803828
  2. [2]Ribatti D, Vacca A, Nico B, Sansonno D, Dammacco F. Angiogenesis and anti‐angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2006; 32(6): 437‐ 44. 16870349
  3. [3]Pang R, Poon RT. Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2006; 242(2): 151‐ 67. 16564617
  4. [4]Wang YH, Dong YY, Wang WM, Xie XY, Wang ZM, Chen RX, et al. Vascular endothelial cells facilitated HCC invasion and metastasis through the Akt and NF‐κB pathways induced by paracrine cytokines. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 32(1): 51. 23941552 PMC3751285
  5. [5]Teleanu RI, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, Teleanu DM. Tumor Angiogenesis and Anti‐Angiogenic Strategies for Cancer Treatment. J Clin Med. 2019; 9(1): 84. PMC7020037 31905724
  6. [6]Rizzo A, Dadduzio V, Ricci AD, Massari F, Di Federico A, Gadaleta‐Caldarola G, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab: the next frontier for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma? Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2022; 31(4): 371‐ 8. 34167433
  7. [7]Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 16(10): 589‐ 604. 31439937 PMC6813818
  8. [8]Llovet JM, Montal R, Sia D, Finn RS. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018; 15(10): 599‐ 616. 30061739 PMC12452113
  9. [9]Huang A, Yang XR, Chung WY, Dennison AR, Zhou J. Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020; 5(1): 146. 32782275 PMC7419547
  10. [10]Morse MA, Sun W, Kim R, He AR, Abada PB, Mynderse M, et al. The Role of Angiogenesis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(3): 912‐ 20. 30274981
  11. [11]Wang Z, Dabrosin C, Yin X, Fuster MM, Arreola A, Rathmell WK, et al. Broad targeting of angiogenesis for cancer prevention and therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015; 35(Suppl): S224‐ s43. 25600295 PMC4737670
  12. [12]Rizzo A, Brandi G. Biochemical predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021; 27: 100328. 33549983
  13. [13]Farnsworth RH, Lackmann M, Achen MG, Stacker SA. Vascular remodeling in cancer. Oncogene. 2014; 33(27): 3496‐ 505. 23912450
  14. [14]Gupta MK, Qin RY. Mechanism and its regulation of tumor‐induced angiogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003; 9(6): 1144‐ 55. 12800214 PMC4611774
  15. [15]Krock BL, Skuli N, Simon MC. Hypoxia‐induced angiogenesis: good and evil. Genes Cancer. 2011; 2(12): 1117‐ 33. 22866203 PMC3411127
  16. [16]Semenza GL. Hypoxia‐inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 33(4): 207‐ 14. 22398146 PMC3437546
  17. [17]Schrader J, Gordon‐Walker TT, Aucott RL, van Deemter M, Quaas A, Walsh S, et al. Matrix stiffness modulates proliferation, chemotherapeutic response, and dormancy in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2011; 53(4): 1192‐ 205. 21442631 PMC3076070
  18. [18]Dong Y, Zheng Q, Wang Z, Lin X, You Y, Wu S, et al. Higher matrix stiffness as an independent initiator triggers epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and facilitates HCC metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019; 12(1): 112. 31703598 PMC6839087
  19. [19]Tang RZ, Gu SS, Chen XT, He LJ, Wang KP, Liu XQ. Immobilized Transforming Growth Factor‐Beta 1 in a Stiffness‐Tunable Artificial Extracellular Matrix Enhances Mechanotransduction in the Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019; 11(16): 14660‐ 71. 30973698
  20. [20]Wu S, Zheng Q, Xing X, Dong Y, Wang Y, You Y, et al. Matrix stiffness‐upregulated LOXL2 promotes fibronectin production, MMP9 and CXCL12 expression and BMDCs recruitment to assist pre‐metastatic niche formation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 37(1): 99. 29728125 PMC5935912
  21. [21]Wu S, Xing X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Li M, Wang M, et al. The pathological significance of LOXL2 in pre‐metastatic niche formation of HCC and its related molecular mechanism. Eur J Cancer. 2021; 147: 63‐ 73. 33618200
  22. [22]You Y, Zheng Q, Dong Y, Xie X, Wang Y, Wu S, et al. Matrix stiffness‐mediated effects on stemness characteristics occurring in HCC cells. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(22): 32221‐ 31. 27050147 PMC5078009
  23. [23]Zhao W, Lv M, Yang X, Zhou J, Xing B, Zhang Z. Liver tumor‐initiating cells initiate the formation of a stiff cancer stem cell microenvironment niche by secreting LOX. Carcinogenesis. 2022 Apr 18:bgac035. 35436337
  24. [24]You Y, Zheng Q, Dong Y, Wang Y, Zhang L, Xue T, et al. Higher Matrix Stiffness Upregulates Osteopontin Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Mediated by Integrin β1/GSK3β/β‐Catenin Signaling Pathway. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8): e0134243. 26280346 PMC4539226
  25. [25]Yang N, Chen T, Wang L, Liu R, Niu Y, Sun L, et al. CXCR4 mediates matrix stiffness‐induced downregulation of UBTD1 driving hepatocellular carcinoma progression via YAP signaling pathway. Theranostics. 2020; 10(13): 5790‐ 801. 32483419 PMC7255012
  26. [26]Liu HH, Xu Y, Li CJ, Hsu SJ, Lin XH, Zhang R, et al. An SCD1‐dependent mechanoresponsive pathway promotes HCC invasion and metastasis through lipid metabolic reprogramming. Mol Ther. 2022; 30(7): 2554‐ 67. 35358687 PMC9263248
  27. [27]Liu QP, Luo Q, Deng B, Ju Y, Song GB. Stiffer Matrix Accelerates Migration of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells through Enhanced Aerobic Glycolysis Via the MAPK‐YAP Signaling. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(2). PMC7072284 32093118
  28. [28]Filliol A, Schwabe RF. Contributions of Fibroblasts, Extracellular Matrix, Stiffness, and Mechanosensing to Hepatocarcinogenesis. Semin Liver Dis. 2019; 39(3): 315‐ 33. 31226725
  29. [29]Liu QP, Luo Q, Deng B, Ju Y, Song GB. Stiffer Matrix Accelerates Migration of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells through Enhanced Aerobic Glycolysis Via the MAPK‐YAP Signaling. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(2): 490. PMC7072284 32093118
  30. [30]Gao X, Qiao X, Xing X, Huang J, Qian J, Wang Y, et al. Matrix Stiffness‐Upregulated MicroRNA‐17‐5p Attenuates the Intervention Effects of Metformin on HCC Invasion and Metastasis by Targeting the PTEN/PI3K/Akt Pathway. Front Oncol. 2020; 10: 1563. 32974191 PMC7466473
  31. [31]Dong Y, Xie X, Wang Z, Hu C, Zheng Q, Wang Y, et al. Increasing matrix stiffness upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells mediated by integrin β1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014; 444(3): 427‐ 32. 24472554
  32. [32]Wang Y, Zhang X, Wang W, Xing X, Wu S, Dong Y, et al. Integrin αVβ5/Akt/Sp1 pathway participates in matrix stiffness‐mediated effects on VEGFR2 upregulation in vascular endothelial cells. Am J Cancer Res. 2020; 10(8): 2635‐ 48. 32905444 PMC7471346
  33. [33]Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L, Lakins JN, Egeblad M, Erler JT, et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 2009; 139(5): 891‐ 906. 19931152 PMC2788004
  34. [34]Wu J, Lewis AH, Grandl J. Touch, Tension, and Transduction ‐ The Function and Regulation of Piezo Ion Channels. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017; 42(1): 57‐ 71. 27743844 PMC5407468
  35. [36]Tsuchiya M, Hara Y, Okuda M, Itoh K, Nishioka R, Shiomi A, et al. Cell surface flip‐flop of phosphatidylserine is critical for PIEZO1‐mediated myotube formation. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1): 2049. 29799007 PMC5967302
  36. [37]Lin YC, Guo YR, Miyagi A, Levring J, MacKinnon R, Scheuring S. Force‐induced conformational changes in PIEZO1. Nature. 2019; 573(7773): 230‐ 4. 31435018 PMC7258172
  37. [38]Chen X, Wanggou S, Bodalia A, Zhu M, Dong W, Fan JJ, et al. A Feedforward Mechanism Mediated by Mechanosensitive Ion Channel PIEZO1 and Tissue Mechanics Promotes Glioma Aggression. Neuron. 2018; 100(4): 799‐ 815.e7. 30344046
  38. [39]Kang H, Hong Z, Zhong M, Klomp J, Bayless KJ, Mehta D, et al. Piezo1 mediates angiogenesis through activation of MT1‐MMP signaling. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2019; 316(1): C92‐c103. 30427721 PMC6383143
  39. [40]Wang TH, Hsia SM, Shieh TM. Lysyl Oxidase and the Tumor Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 18(1). PMC5297697 28036074
  40. [41]Xu S, Xu H, Wang W, Li S, Li H, Li T, et al. The role of collagen in cancer: from bench to bedside. J Transl Med. 2019; 17(1): 309. 31521169 PMC6744664
  41. [42]Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018; 68(2): 723‐ 50. 29624699
  42. [43]Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10(2 Suppl 1): S115‐ 20. 14762851
  43. [44]Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population‐based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67(2): 93‐ 9. 28094848
  44. [45]Edmondson HA, Steiner PE. Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer. 1954; 7(3): 462‐ 503. 13160935
  45. [46]Agbim U, Asrani SK. Non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and prognosis: an update on serum and elastography markers. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 13(4): 361‐ 74. 30791772
  46. [47]Terada H, Komeichi H, Aramaki T. [Child‐Pugh classification in liver cirrhosis]. Ryoikibetsu Shokogun Shirizu. 1995(7): 151‐ 4. 8749441
  47. [48]Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996; 24(2): 289‐ 93. 8690394
  48. [49]EASL‐ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non‐invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2015; 63(1): 237‐ 64. 25911335
  49. [51]Naito Y, Yoshioka Y, Yamamoto Y, Ochiya T. How cancer cells dictate their microenvironment: present roles of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017; 74(4): 697‐ 713. 27582126 PMC5272899
  50. [52]Maacha S, Bhat AA, Jimenez L, Raza A, Haris M, Uddin S, et al. Extracellular vesicles‐mediated intercellular communication: roles in the tumor microenvironment and anti‐cancer drug resistance. Mol Cancer. 2019; 18(1): 55. 30925923 PMC6441157
  51. [53]Wang JC, Li GY, Li PP, Sun X, Li WM, Li Y, et al. Suppression of hypoxia‐induced excessive angiogenesis by metformin via elevating tumor blood perfusion. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(43): 73892‐ 904. 29088755 PMC5650310
  52. [54]Luo W, Hu H, Chang R, Zhong J, Knabel M, O'Meally R, et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3‐stimulated coactivator for hypoxia‐inducible factor 1. Cell. 2011; 145(5): 732‐ 44. 21620138 PMC3130564
  53. [55]Gao Q, Zhao YJ, Wang XY, Qiu SJ, Shi YH, Sun J, et al. CXCR6 upregulation contributes to a proinflammatory tumor microenvironment that drives metastasis and poor patient outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(14): 3546‐ 56. 22710437
  54. [56]Azar WJ, Azar SH, Higgins S, Hu JF, Hoffman AR, Newgreen DF, et al. IGFBP‐2 enhances VEGF gene promoter activity and consequent promotion of angiogenesis by neuroblastoma cells. Endocrinology. 2011; 152(9): 3332‐ 42. 21750048
  55. [57]Zanotelli MR, Reinhart‐King CA. Mechanical Forces in Tumor Angiogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1092: 91‐ 112. 30368750 PMC6986816
  56. [58]Lee JW, Bae SH, Jeong JW, Kim SH, Kim KW. Hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF‐1)alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004; 36(1): 1‐ 12. 15031665
  57. [59]Xing X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Gao X, Li M, Wu S, et al. Matrix stiffness‐mediated effects on macrophages polarization and their LOXL2 expression. Febs j. 2021; 288(11): 3465‐ 77. 32964626
  58. [60]Choi KS, Bae MK, Jeong JW, Moon HE, Kim KW. Hypoxia‐induced angiogenesis during carcinogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2003; 36(1): 120‐ 7. 12542982
  59. [62]Zhang J, Wei J, Kanada M, Yan L, Zhang Z, Watanabe H, et al. Inhibition of store‐operated Ca2+ entry suppresses EGF‐induced migration and eliminates extravasation from vasculature in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell. Cancer Lett. 2013; 336(2): 390‐ 7. 23623984
  60. [64]Han Y, Liu C, Zhang D, Men H, Huo L, Geng Q, et al. Mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 promotes prostate cancer development through the activation of the Akt/mTOR pathway and acceleration of cell cycle. Int J Oncol. 2019; 55(3): 629‐ 44. 31322184 PMC6685593
  61. [65]Azimi I. The interplay between HIF‐1 and calcium signalling in cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018; 97: 73‐ 7. 29407528
  62. [66]Yu S, Xu Z, Zou C, Wu D, Wang Y, Yao X, et al. Ion channel TRPM8 promotes hypoxic growth of prostate cancer cells via an O2 ‐independent and RACK1‐mediated mechanism of HIF‐1α stabilization. J Pathol. 2014; 234(4): 514‐ 25. 25065497
  63. [67]Chen SJ, Hoffman NE, Shanmughapriya S, Bao L, Keefer K, Conrad K, et al. A splice variant of the human ion channel TRPM2 modulates neuroblastoma tumor growth through hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF)‐1/2α. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289(52): 36284‐ 302. 25391657 PMC4276889
  64. [68]Li D, Zhang J, Li J. Role of miRNA sponges in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2020; 500: 10‐ 9. 31604064

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Zhang, X., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Qian, J., Xing, X., Wang, Z., You, Y., Guo, K., Chen, J., Gao, D., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, R., Cui, J., & Ren, Z.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cui, Jiefeng
  • Ren, Zhenggang
Venue
Cancer Communications
Published
2022-10-01
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
1162-1184
ISSN
  • 1000-467X (ISSN-L)
  • 2523-3548
OpenAlex
W4298326482
Cited by
181
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • 癌症:英文版 (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972910)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Caveolin-1 and cellular processes
Keywords
Piezo1, extracellular matrix stiffness, angiogenesis, hepatocellular carcinoma, beta1 integrin, mechanosensing, miR-625-5p, type I collagen, vascular endothelial growth factor, CXCL16, IGFBP-2, tumor hypoxia, lung metastasis, liver stiffness, vascular endothelial cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Ion Channels, Liver Neoplasms, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Integrin beta1, MicroRNAs, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Endothelial Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review