Cited by 62Teaching and Learning ProgrammingGender and Technology in EducationInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Development of computer programming attitude scale for university students

Open access
Cetin, Ibrahim, Ozden, M. Yasar·2015·Computer Applications in Engineering Education

Abstract

Although the determination of university students' attitudes towards computer programming is a significant issue, the issue has been rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to develop an attitude scale assessing university students' attitudes towards computer programming. In the first phase, the scale was administered to 522 university students. Explanatory factor analysis yielded three dimensions: affection, cognition, and behavior. In the second phase, final version of the 18 item‐scale was administered to 553 university students. Results of confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence for the factorial structure of the scale. The Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from 0.80 to 0.90. Psychometric properties of Computer Programming Attitude Scale (CPAS) suggest that it is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring university students' attitudes towards computer programming. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. Comput Appl Eng Educ 23:667–672, 2015; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/cae; DOI 10.1002/cae.21639

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cae.21639

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students' attitudes towards computer programming (ATCP) have not received much attention in the field.

    “Nevertheless, students' attitudes towards computer programming (ATCP) have not received much attention in the field (Cetin & Ozden, 2015).”

    From Factors Affecting Students' Attitudes toward Computer Programming (2019) · cites this paper as Cetin & Ozden, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cetin, I., & Ozden, M. Y.
Affiliations
  • Secondary Science and Mathematics Education Department Education Faculty, Abant Izzet Baysal University Bolu Turkey
  • Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department Education Faculty, Eastern Mediterranean University Famagusta North Cyprus
Venue
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-08
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
667-672
ISSN
  • 1061-3773 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0542
OpenAlex
W1493787204
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Applications in Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
  • Eastern Mediterranean University Institutional Repository (Eastern Mediterranean University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
attitude scale development, university students, scale validation, psychometric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review