CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Educational Technology and AssessmentEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentEducational Technology and E-Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TDEG based framework and tools for innovation in teaching technical drawing: The example of LaMoo project

Villa, Valerio, Motyl, Barbara, Paderno, Diego, Baronio, Gabriele·2018·Computer Applications in Engineering Education
DOI 10.1002/cae.22022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This work presents the development of an integrated framework and related tools for innovation and improvement in the teaching of Technical Drawing. This framework is based on the “Technical Drawing Evaluation Grid—TDEG.” This grid is currently used, by the authors, for the definition and the development of different kinds of tools for supporting both teaching and learning and for the evaluation of Technical Drawing and engineering graphics topics knowledge in general. In particular, this paper focuses on the problems related to knowledge evaluation and assessment of Technical Drawing using online tests. Then, the LaMoo project which is a tool under development for the structured construction of questions for online tests in Moodle environment is presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cae.22022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1002/cae.21728 · DOI
  2. R. E.Barr The current status of graphical communication in engineering education IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) vol.3 Savannah GA 2004 pp.S1D/8–S1D13 https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408688 · DOI
  3. Clark A. C., 2006, A study of current trends and issues for graphics education: results from a five‐year follow‐up survey, Eng. Design Graphics J, 70, 23
  4. Contero M., 2006, Learning support tools for developing spatial abilities in engineering design, Int. J. Eng. Educ, 22, 470
  5. T. M.de Salles TibúrcioandL. P.Monnerat Revising the teaching of technical drawing: New technologies creating new paradigms 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning—ICL Villach Austria 2012 pp.1–7. · DOI
  6. 10.7227/IJMEE.41.4.7 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/03043790701276874 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/cae.1012 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-319-02958-0_45 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/cae.20344 · DOI
  11. G.Kabouridis An innovative approach to face the first‐year mechanical engineering students’ conceptual difficulties in engineering design 1st WIETE Annual Conference on Engineering and Technology Education Pattaya Thailand 2010 pp.110–113.
  12. 10.7227/IJMEE.39.4.5 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0306419017749579 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/09720073.2016.11892109 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cag.2009.11.003 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cae.20447 · DOI
  17. R.Metraglia G.Baronio andV.Villa Issues in learning engineering graphics fundamentals: Shall we blame CAD?ICED15—International Conference on Engineering Design Milan Italy 2015 pp.31–40.
  18. R.Metraglia G.Baronio andV.Villa Learning levels in technical drawing education: Proposal for an assessment grid based on the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) ICED 11‐18th International Conference on Engineering Design—Impacting Society Through Engineering Design vol.8 Copenhagen 2011 pp.161–172.
  19. Metraglia R., 2015, High school graphics experience influencing the self‐efficacy of first‐year engineering students in an introductory engineering graphics course, Eng. Design Graphics J, 79, 16
  20. Metraglia R., 2014, Engineering graphics education: Webcomics as a tool to improve weaker students’ motivation, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol, 7, 4106, 10.19026/rjaset.7.774 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.282 · DOI
  22. K.Nabutolaet al. Development of CAD‐related items for a concept inventory for engineering graphics 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Columbus Ohio 2017 pp.1–11. Paper ID #18055.
  23. F.Naya M.Contero andJ.Dorribo‐Camba A multi‐touch application for the automatic evaluation of dimensions in hand‐drawn sketches IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Oklahoma City OK 2013 pp.195–199.https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6684815 · DOI
  24. S. Y.Nozaki The development of a concept inventory for engineering graphics PhD dissertation 2017 The Ohaio State University Available online at:https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1492700458180303&disposition=inline(Accessed May 22 2018).
  25. S.Nozakiet al. Development of a concept inventory for engineering design graphics 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition New Orleans United States 2016; Paper ID #16602.
  26. S. Y.Nozakiet al. The development of a concept inventory for engineering graphics IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Erie PA 2016 pp.1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757430 · DOI
  27. M. A.PaigeandK.Fu Spatial demonstration tools for teaching geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) to first‐year undergraduate engineering students 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Columbus OH 2017 Paper ID #17885.
  28. 10.1002/cae.20303 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/03043790600567894 · DOI
  30. Schmidt L. C., 2012, Research on encouraging sketching in engineering design, AI EDAM, 26, 303
  31. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00529.x · DOI
  32. 10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_90 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1293616 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/cae.21580 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Villa, V., Motyl, B., Paderno, D., & Baronio, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
Corresponding author
Villa, Valerio
ORCID
Venue
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-12
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1293-1305
ISSN
  • 1061-3773 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0542
DOI
10.1002/cae.22022
OpenAlex
W2812756587
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Computer Applications in Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
engineering graphics education, engineering graphics, educational innovation, knowledge assessment, online examinations, Moodle, assessment instruments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TDEG based framework and tools for innovation in teaching technical drawing: The example of LaMoo project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cae.22022
The paper
Villa, V., Motyl, B., Paderno, D., & Baronio, G. (2018). TDEG based framework and tools for innovation in teaching technical drawing: The example of LaMoo project. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22022