A TpM‐based collaborative system to teach IoT
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a multidisciplinary field involving different areas of knowledge. The development of IoT solutions depends on the integration and collaborative work between professionals from all of these areas. This has led to the development of methodologies to teach IoT, such as the three-phase methodology (TpM). This study presents a collaborative system that operationalizes the use of the TpM, aiding in the process of teaching IoT. This system guides and integrates teams developing IoT solutions while providing easy and structured access to information about the project. The system has been used in short and graduation courses. The results have demonstrated its efficiency in assisting students to develop solutions while applying the TpM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IoT inherently involves the integration of multiple subsystems.
“As [7] observes, IoT inherently involves the integration of multiple subsystems, painting a rich tapestry of interconnected work systems.”
From IoT and Blockchain for Support for Smart Contracts Through TpM (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The TpM-IoT Canvas is efficacious in generating comprehensive reports and clearly delineating the business context.
“The TpM highlights the multifaceted benefits of the usage of TpM-IoT Canvas [6,7], emphasizing its efficacy in not only generating comprehensive reports but also in clearly delineating the business context.”
From IoT and Blockchain for Support for Smart Contracts Through TpM (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7 · Cited by 3,001 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
IoT and Blockchain for Support for Smart Contracts Through TpM
Yamaguti, R., Ferreira, L. C. B. C., Lui Motta, L., Montali Assumpção, R., Branquinho, O. C., Iervolino, G., & Cardieri, P. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25165001 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“As [7] observes, IoT inherently involves the integration of multiple subsystems, painting a rich tapestry of interconnected work systems.”
InfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Ferreira, L. C. B. C., Yamaguti, R., Branquinho, O. C., & Cardieri, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Yamaguti, Renan
- Venue
- Computer Applications in Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-09-24
- ISSN
- 1061-3773 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0542
- OpenAlex
- W3203443617
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer Applications in Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Arduino and IoT Applications
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- IoT education, collaborative learning platforms, multidisciplinary collaboration, engineering education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
