Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic factors of adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation among stage III colon cancer patients: A survey of medical oncologists and a systematic review and meta-analysis

Boyne, Devon J., O'Sullivan, Dylan E., Heer, Emily V., Hilsden, Robert J., Sajobi, Tolulope T., Cheung, Winson Y., Brenner, Darren R., Friedenreich, Christine M.·2020·Cancer Medicine

Abstract

Background: Factors that are prognostic of early discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy among stage III colon cancer patients have yet to be described. To address this gap, a survey of medical oncologists and a systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted. Methods: A survey was distributed in March 2019 to medical oncologists who treat colon cancer within Alberta, Canada. Clinicians were asked to rank the prognostic importance of a set of variables using a Likert scale and agreement was quantified using a weighted Cohen's kappa. In addition, we systematically searched four databases up to July 2019. Meta‐analyses were conducted using a random‐effects model. Results: Of the 25 clinicians who were sent the survey, 14 responded. Overall, there was no agreement regarding which variables were prognostic of early discontinuation (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.05‐0.18). From an initial 3927 articles, 18 investigations were identified for inclusion in our review. Based upon evidence from both the survey and the systematic review, the following four variables were identified as being prognostic of early discontinuation: (a) comorbidity (OR 2+ vs 0 = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.30‐1.79); (b) performance status (OR ECOG 2+ vs 0‐1 = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.07‐1.65); (c) T stage (OR T4 vs T1‐2 = 1.57; 95% CI = 0.99‐2.50); and (d) chemotherapy regimen (estimates not pooled due to heterogeneity). In addition to these factors, there was some suggestion that age, marital status/social support, muscle mass, N stage, and tumor grade had prognostic value. Conclusions: Current evidence is heterogeneous and limited. Additional research is needed to confirm our findings and to explore additional prognostic factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.2843

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram. This figure describes the inclusion and exclusion of studies in our systematic review
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram. This figure describes the inclusion and exclusion of studies in our systematic reviewCC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The proportion of stage III colon cancer patients who discontinued chemotherapy among studies included in systematic review (n = 18). This figure presents results from a meta‐analysis of the proportion of patients who discontinued chemotherapy stratified by study design
Figure 2 The proportion of stage III colon cancer patients who discontinued chemotherapy among studies included in systematic review (n = 18). This figure presents results from a meta‐analysis of the proportion of patients who discontinued chemotherapy stratified by study designCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6771 · DOI
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00001 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJMoa032709 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/annonc/mdr366 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/annonc/mdt433 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.04.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0405 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4154 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/sim.6546 · DOI
  10. 10.1136/bmj.k4597 · DOI
  11. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Naing L, 2006, Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies, Archives Orofacial Sci, 1, 9
  13. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1136/bmj.d549 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/sim.2331 · DOI · Paper page
  17. RStudio Team.RStudio: integrated development for R.Boston MA:RStudio Inc.2015;42:14.http://www.rstudio.com
  18. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.09.001 · DOI
  19. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Crippa A, 2016, Multivariate dose‐response meta‐analysis: the dosresmeta R package, J Stat Softw, 72, 1
  21. 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0058 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.05.004 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/cncr.30950 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s12032-010-9644-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1385/MO:23:4:521 · DOI
  26. 10.1001/jama.2010.272 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.05.010 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603627 · DOI
  29. 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.9530 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s12029-015-9746-8 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1078155217718381 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.12.008 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/codi.12288 · DOI
  34. Erning FN, 1990, Intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and grade III‐V toxicities among elderly stage III colon cancer patients, Eur J Cancer, 2016, 1
  35. 10.1016/S0959-8049(16)31051-6 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/jama.2012.385 · DOI
  37. 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0855 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Boyne, D. J., O'Sullivan, D. E., Heer, E. V., Hilsden, R. J., Sajobi, T. T., Cheung, W. Y., Brenner, D. R., & Friedenreich, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
  • Department of Public Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada
  • Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research CancerControl Alberta Alberta Health Services Calgary Alberta Canada
  • Department of Medicine Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-21
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1613-1627
ISSN
2045-7634
Cited by
11
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review