Cited by 13Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesHead and Neck Cancer Studies

The effect of surgery plus chemoradiotherapy on survival of elderly patients with stage Ⅱ–Ⅲ esophageal cancer: a SEER‐based demographic analysis

Open access
Lv, Hao, Chao, Ce, Wang, Bin, Wang, Zhigang, Qian, Yongxiang, Zhang, Xiaoying·2021·Cancer Medicine

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment for elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains controversial. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether elderly patients with stage II–III EC could benefit from trimodal therapy. Methods: The selected elderly patients with stage II–III EC between 2004 and 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they underwent surgery. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was used to balance the confounding factors between the two groups. The Cox regression analysis, the log‐rank test, and the Kaplan–Meier curves were conducted to identify the survival benefits of different treatment regimes. Results: A total of 1596 patients were included in this cohort study, in which 278 patients underwent surgery. In the combination of chemoradiotherapy and surgery group, there were more male patients, more patients aged between 75 and 79 years, and more married patients in the surgery group. Moreover, there were more patients with adenomatous carcinoma, more patients with a tumor size of less than 5 cm, and more patients with a T3 stage in the combination group. In the survival analysis, patients in the combination group had a longer overall survival (OS) and EC‐specific survival (ECSS). After IPTW analysis, the survival analysis generated similar results. The competitive risk model found that our results were stable. There was still a significant difference in OS and ECSS between the combination group and chemoradiotherapy alone group for esophageal adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Elderly patients with stage II–III EC, especially those with adenocarcinoma, could benefit from the combination of surgery and chemoradiotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.4352

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most patients with esophageal cancer are already in stage II to IV when they seek medical help, which brings challenges to treatment and recovery.

    “However, most patients with esophageal cancer are already in stage II to IV when they seek medical help, which brings challenges to treatment and recovery [7,8].”

    From Symptom Experiences before Medical Help-Seeking and Psychosocial Responses of Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Qualitative Study. (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction says the vast majority of elderly patients with esophageal cancer are already advanced when first diagnosed, and it discusses difficulties in treating elderly patients with locally advanced disease. It does not establish that most patients of all ages present specifically at stages II–IV or that late presentation itself causes the stated treatment and recovery challenges. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lv, H., Chao, C., Wang, B., Wang, Z., Qian, Y., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Xiaoying
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-19
Volume
10
Issue
23
Pages
8483-8496
ISSN
2045-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212148677
Cited by
13
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
esophageal cancer, elderly patients, esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy, trimodality therapy, esophageal adenocarcinoma, overall survival, stage II/III esophageal cancer, SEER
MeSH terms
Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, United States, Survival Rate, Esophagectomy, SEER Program, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review