The Relevance of Long‐Term Antecedents in Assessing the Risk of Familicide‐Suicide Following Separation
Abstract
Familicide‐suicide following separation is under‐researched and remains a poorly understood phenomenon. Findings from previous research are inconclusive in relation to both risk factors and perpetrator motivation. This article explores the relevance of long‐term biopsychosocial antecedents in cases of familicide‐suicide that occurred in Western Australia between 1986 and 2005. A conceptualisation of the hypothesised risk factors in familicide‐suicide is proposed based on attachment theory, personality dysfunction, the neurobiology of trauma and the possible unconscious motivation of perpetrators, which may prove helpful in assessing the risk of familicide‐suicide in family court cases. The research identified and articulated a number of warning signs to familicide‐suicide that are often not identified, or appreciated, by decision makers. Suggestions are offered for changes to practice that may be helpful in identifying and responding to high‐risk cases in a way that enhances safety. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ‘A conceptualisation of the hypothesised risk factors in familicide‐suicide is proposed’ Key Practitioner Messages Clinicians need to be aware of the dynamic psychosocial risk factors associated with violent acting out such as: The combination of Cluster B personality diagnoses. A history of domestic violence. Early childhood trauma requires good interagency communication and cooperation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A history of multiple breaches of court orders, stalking and a highly controlling ex-partner are indications of high risk of lethality for women and children.
“A history of multiple breaches of court orders, stalking and a highly controlling ex-partner are indications of high risk of lethality for women and children (Sachmann & Johnson, 2014).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Sachmann & Johnson, 2014
Cites
Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., & Yerington, T. P. (2000) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1023/a:1007558330501 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Testing a typology of batterers
Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.658 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis
Spearman, K. J., Hardesty, J. L., & Campbell, J. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15310 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“A history of multiple breaches of court orders, stalking and a highly controlling ex-partner are indications of high risk of lethality for women and children (Sachmann & Johnson, 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Sachmann, M., & Harris Johnson, C. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- School of Population Health The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
- Venue
- Child Abuse Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-141
- ISSN
- 0952-9136 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0852
- OpenAlex
- W1935259277
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse Review (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- familicide, suicide, family separation, risk factors, biopsychosocial model, attachment theory, personality dysfunction, cluster B personality disorders, neurobiology of trauma, perpetrator motivation, domestic violence, early childhood trauma, family court, warning signs, inter-agency communication, Western Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review