Cited by 215Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceCrime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Testing a typology of batterers

Waltz, Jennifer, Babcock, Julia C., Jacobson, Neil S., Gottman, John M.·2000·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

A. Holtzworth-Munroe and G. L. Stuart (1994) proposed a tripartite typology of men who batter their female partners based on the severity of violence, extent of violence, and personality disorder characteristics. The current study attempts to empirically validate this typology using data from 75 domestically violent (DV) men and their partners, and 32 maritally distressed, nonviolent (DNV) comparison couples. Mixture analysis results generally supported the model, although 2 types were not distinguishable on personality disorder characteristics as predicted. Generally violent batterers were significantly more violent within and outside the relationship. The pathological group was moderately violent within and outside the relationship and endorsed numerous psychological symptoms. Family-only batterers endorsed fewer symptoms and were less violent. Violence in the family of origin, attachment, and communication skills also differentiated the 3 types and DNV men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.658

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been asserted that a subtype of individuals, being mostly antisocial and highly violent, are especially prone to be avoidant.

    “it has been asserted that a subtype of individuals, being mostly antisocial and highly violent, are especially prone to be avoidant (Waltz et al., 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Montana (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2000-08
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
658-669
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2008299012
Cited by
215
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000257-09, 1r37mh044063-01a1, 5r01mh043101-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R37-MH44063-04, 5RO1 MH 43101-04, K02-MH00257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
domestic violence, batterer typology, intimate partner violence, personality disorders, mixture analysis, attachment, communication skills, marital distress, psychological symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Self Disclosure, Spouse Abuse, Violence, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review