The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action
Abstract
The present study is an investigation into the social psychological factors associated with women's reported participation in a range of different types of political action in the context of gender relations. At time 1,610 women were asked to rate their readiness to participate in various actions and to provide measures of social beliefs. Factor analysis extracted four types of action: participation in women's groups, collective protest, informal participation, and individual protest. One year later, at time 2, a subgroup of the same women were asked to say how much they had actually participated over the previous 12 months. Reported participation was related to gender identity, collective relative deprivation, efficacy, collectivist orientation, and identification as an activist. Regression analysis showed that identification as an activist was by far the most powerful correlate of participation, followed by gender identity; and that gender identity also played a role in moderating relationships between reported participation and other predictor variables. These findings show the important role of identity processes underlying participation in collective action and suggest the need to develop interaction models of participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Cited by
Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00047-7 · Cited by 1,262
A Social Psychology of Protest: Individuals in Action
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823354 · Cited by 1,016
The Social Psychology of Protest
Triandafyllidou, A., & Klandermans, B. (1998) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591325 · Cited by 928
The social psychology of protest
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113479314 · Cited by 740
Collective identification and social movement participation.
Simon, B. C., Loewy, M. I., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C., & Spahlinger, P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.646 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-57
- ISSN
- 1052-9284 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1298
- OpenAlex
- W1984840725
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/casp.2450050104
- The paper
- Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450050104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.