Cited by 7,611Behavioral Health and InterventionsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research

Ajzen, Icek, Fishbein, Martin·1977·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Research on the relation between attitude and behavior is examined in light of the correspondence between attitudinal and behavioral entities. Such entities are defined by their target, action, context, and time elements. A review of available empirical research supports the contention that strong attitude-behavior relations dre obtained only under high correspondence between at least the target and action elements of the attitudinal and behavioral entities. This conclusion is compared with the rather pessimistic assessment of the utility of the attitude concept found in much contemporary social psychological literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General dispositions tend to be poor predictors of behavior in specific situations.

    “Much has been made of the fact that general dispositions tend to be poor predictors of behavior in specific situations.”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977

  • For accurate prediction, measures of intention and perceived behavioral control must correspond to or be compatible with the behavior to be predicted.

    “First, the measures of intention and of perceived behavioral control must correspond to (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977) or be compatible with (Ajzen, 1988) the behavior that is to be predicted.”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977

  • Attitude is a strong predictor of behavior and is associated with behavioral intention to consume a variety of foods, including functional foods.

    “Commonly, attitude is a strong predictor of behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977) and is associated with behavioral intention to consume a variety of foods (Cook, Kerr, & Moore, 2002;Patch, Tapsell, & Williams, 2005;Verbeke, 2005), including functional foods (Hung, de Kok, & Verbeke, 2016;O'Connor & White, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1977-09
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
888-918
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1981018178
Cited by
7,611
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 183 · 2025: 314 · 2024: 389 · 2023: 497 · 2022: 423 · 2021: 448 · 2020: 448 · 2019: 399 · 2018: 337 · 2017: 356 · 2016: 311 · 2015: 326 · 2014: 352 · 2013: 236 · 2012: 212
FWCI
41.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
attitude-behavior relationship, attitude theory, social psychology of attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review