The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making
Abstract
Consumer concern for ethical issues has been well documented across much of the developed world. Research on values is also prominent in the literature. Neglected in consumer behaviour is an understanding of the pertinence of particular values in ethical decision making contexts. This paper outlines the results of qualitative research, which explores those values pertinent to ethical consumers in decision making and the nature of their influence in grocery consumption contexts. A questionnaire was used to ascertain the dominance and nature of values influencing consumer decision making in this context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
Deci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911
Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption
Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10008 · Cited by 572
Self-citation
Cited by
An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours
Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x · Cited by 383
Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J., & Battenfeld, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320 · Cited by 330
Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., Bosangit, C., Ferreira, C., & McGrath, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2893-9 · Cited by 138
“Other developments of this model entail the inclusion of values as determinants of ethical consumption behaviour (Shaw et al. 2005), but these rationalist approaches suffer from a particular limitation regarding the assessment of consumers’ actions when motivated by ethical concerns (Raats et al.…”
BackgroundSharing and Sustainable Consumption in the Era of COVID-19
Degli Esposti, P., Mortara, A., & Roberti, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041903 · Cited by 121
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption
F. Burke, P., Eckert, C., & Davis, S. (2014) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2013-0294 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, D., Grehan, E., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., & Thomson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Behaviour
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-200
- ISSN
- 1472-0817 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1838
- DOI
- 10.1002/cb.3
- OpenAlex
- W2114954228
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cb.3
- The paper
- Shaw, D., Grehan, E., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., & Thomson, J. (2005). An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
