Cited by 5,681Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsHuman Behavior and Motivation

Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.

White, Robert W.·1959·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0040934

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, R. W.
Corresponding author
White, Robert W.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1959-09
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
297-333
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2075670547
Cited by
5,681
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 344 · 2022: 242 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 234 · 2019: 300 · 2018: 202 · 2017: 230 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 195 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 141 · 2012: 170
FWCI
22.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
motivation, competence, competence concept
MeSH terms
Humans, Motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review