The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Unique Role of Fluorine in the Design of Active Ingredients for Modern Crop Protection
Abstract
The task of inventing and developing active ingredients with useful biological activities requires a search for novel chemical substructures. This process may trigger the discovery of whole classes of chemicals of potential commercial interest. Similar biological effects can often be achieved by completely different compounds. However, compounds within a given structural family may exhibit quite different biological activities depending on their interactions with different intracellular proteins like enzymes or receptors. By varying the functional groups and structural elements of a lead compound, its interaction with the active site of the target protein, as well as its physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and dynamic properties can be improved. In this context, the introduction of fluorine into active ingredients has become an important concept in the quest for a modern crop protection product with optimal efficacy, environmental safety, user friendliness, and economic viability. Fluorinated organic compounds represent an important and growing family of commercial agrochemicals. A number of recently developed agrochemical candidates represent novel classes of chemical compounds with new modes of action; several of these compounds contain new fluorinated substituents. However, the complex structure–activity relationships associated with biologically active molecules mean that the introduction of fluorine can lead to either an increase or a decrease in the efficacy of a compound depending on its changed mode of action, physicochemical properties, target interaction, or metabolic susceptibility and transformation. Therefore, it is still difficult to predict the sites in a molecule at which fluorine substitution will result in optimal desired effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fluorine differs from the other halogen elements and chemical functional groups in many of its properties (Aigueperse et al., 2000; Clark, 2002; Jeschke, 2004; Kirsch, 2004; Emsley, 2011).”
From Nothing lasts forever: understanding microbial biodegradation of polyfluorinated compounds and perfluorinated alkyl substances (2022) · cites this paper as Jeschke, 2004
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 134
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199911)55:11<1043::AID-PS60>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- Ebert E., 1991, Biol. unserer Zeit, 6, 299
- van der Waterbeemd H., 1993, 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, 697
- Filler R., 1982, Biomedicinal Aspects of Fluorine Chemistry, 1
- Northwood P. J., 1986, BCPC Monogr., 33, 233
- 1986, Chem. Abstr., 104, 143 806
- 1985, Chem. Abstr., 103, 196 096
- Halgreen T., 1996, J. Comp. Chem., 17, 490, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<490::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- 1994, Chem. Abstr., 121, 230 784
- 10.1002/jps.2600710611 · DOI
- 10.1002/ps.2780170414 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0890037X00046017 · DOI
- 10.1002/9783527615452 · DOI
- 10.1021/jf00014a028 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0043174500056575 · DOI
- 10.1002/hlca.19240070124 · DOI
- Narahashi T., 1969, Residue Rev., 25, 275
- Bardner R., 1979, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 223
- 10.1038/248710a0 · DOI
- Breese M. H., 1977, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 2, 641
- Behrenz W., 1983, Pflanzenschutz‐Nachr. (German Edition), 36, 127
- Hammann I., 1981, Pflanzenschutz‐Nachr. (German Edition), 34, 121
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199801)52:1<3::AID-PS689>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-74852-3 · DOI
- Robson M. J., 1984, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 3, 853
- Doel H. J. H., 1984, Meded. Fac. Landbouwwet. Univ. Gent, 49, 929
- Gouger R. J., 1986, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 3, 1143
- Pinochet G., 1991, Phytoma, 428, 54
- 10.1002/ps.2780280308 · DOI
- 10.1021/bk-1992-0504.ch024 · DOI
- 1992, Chem. Abstr., 118, 207 479
- 10.1002/ps.2780280309 · DOI
- 1979, Chem. Abstr., 90, 151 658
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-4260-2_3 · DOI
- Pap L., 1996, Int. Pest Control, 38, 15
- 1996, Chem. Abstr., 124, 281 832
- 2000, The Pesticide Manual
- 10.1016/0048-3575(74)90073-X · DOI
- 10.1002/ps.2780040516 · DOI
- Grosscurt A. C., 1977, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 141
- 10.1002/ps.2780280405 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01929918 · DOI
- Neumann R., 1983, Int. Congr. Plant Prot. Proc. Conf. 10th, 1, 445
- 1985, Chem. Abstr., 102, 57 756
- Anderson M., 1986, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 89
- Komblas K. N., 1986, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 3, 907
- 1983, Chem. Abstr., 98, 139 780
- Schenker R., 1994, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 3, 1013
- Ishaaya I., 1996, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 3, 1013
- 1998, Chem. Abstr., 129, 13 497
- Kim K. S., 2000, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 2, 41
- Ishaaya I., 1990, Pesticides and Alternatives, 365
- 10.1016/0048-3575(74)90073-X · DOI
- 10.1002/ps.2780170417 · DOI
- 1999, Metabolic Pathways of Agrochemicals, Part 2: Insecticides and Fungicides, 795
- Hamman I., 1980, Pflanzenschutz‐Nachr. (German Edition), 33, 1
- Blaß W., 1998, Pflanzenschutz‐Nachr. (German Edition), 51, 79
- 10.1271/bbb.56.364 · DOI
- 10.1584/jpestics.18.41 · DOI
- Takahashi H., 1992, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 89
- 10.1007/978-3-642-59549-3_4 · DOI
- Jeschke P., 2002, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 137
- 10.1515/znc-2002-5-616 · DOI
- Kagabu S., 1997, Toxicology, 1, 75
- 10.1002/ciuz.200300283 · DOI
- Berg K. H., 1988, Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors, 168
- 1989, Chem. Abstr., 111, 36 288
- 10.1002/ps.2780040311 · DOI
- Kraemer W., 1986, Chemistry of Plant Protection 1, Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors and Antifeeding Compounds
- 10.1002/ps.2780310405 · DOI
- Kendall S. J., 1986, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 2, 539
- Garavaglia C., 1988, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 49
- Ammermann E., 1990, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 2, 407
- Russell P. E., 1992, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 411
- Reinecke P., 1986, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 41
- Sadhu B. P., 1997, Geobios (Jodhpur, India), 24, 181
- 1997, Chem. Abstr., 127, 91 652
- 10.1002/ps.2780150208 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.501 · DOI
- 1977, Chem. Abstr., 86, 155 686
- 1981, Chem. Abstr., 95, 56 388
- 10.1002/jlac.198419840910 · DOI
- 10.7164/antibiotics.36.661 · DOI
- Sauter H., 1999, Angew. Chem., 38, 1329, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990517)38:10<1328::AID-ANIE1328>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
- 1999, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 38, 1329
- 10.1074/jbc.C100365200 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-5793(81)81190-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0005-2728(96)00049-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/33612 · DOI
- 10.1002/ps.520 · DOI
- Frank J. A., 1994, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 2, 871
- Ammermann E., 1988, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 403
- 10.1021/bk-1995-0584.ch030 · DOI
- Margot P., 1998, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 2, 375
- Ziegler H., 2003, Pflanzenschutz‐Nachr. (German Edition), 56, 213
- Dutzmann S., 2002, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 365
- Mauler‐Machnik A., 2002, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 389
- Godwin J. R., 2000, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 533
- 1996, Chem. Abstr., 125, 142 758
- 10.1007/978-3-642-59416-8_2 · DOI
- Sandmann G., 1997, Rev. Toxicol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 1, 1
- 1998, Chem. Abstr., 128, 137 455
- Devlin R. M., 1975, Proc. Annu. Meet. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc., 29, 161
- 10.1021/jf60208a047 · DOI
- Forbes G. R., 1985, Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 3, 797
- Cramp M. C., 1985, Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 1, 23
- Rogers D. D., 1987, Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 1, 69
- White R. H., 1999, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 47
- Takamura S., 1999, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 41
- 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1987.tb00757.x · DOI
- Förster H., 1997, Pflanzenschutz Nachr. (German Edition), 50, 105
- 10.1584/jpestics.22.257 · DOI
- Ohlrogge J., 1995, Plant Cell, 7
- Burton J. D., 1997, Herbic. Act.: Toxicol. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 187
- 10.1104/pp.42.9.1269 · DOI
- Singh G. B., 1976, Pesticides, 10, 38
- Spindler F., 1998, Chirality Agrochem., 141
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1402 · DOI
- Bieseler B., 1997, Pflanzenschutz Nachr. (German Edition), 50, 117
- 10.1002/ps.519 · DOI
- Palm H. L., 1980, Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 15, 1
- 10.1104/pp.76.2.545 · DOI
- 10.1002/ciuz.200300279 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199608)47:4<309::AID-PS420>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- Schulte M., 1993, Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 1, 53
- 10.1074/jbc.M211648200 · DOI
- Maurer W., 1987, Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 1, 41
- Sanni S. J., 1986, Weeds Weed Control, 1, 37
- 10.1002/ps.2780290302 · DOI
- Palm H. L., 1989, Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 1, 23
- Hashizume B., 1990, Jpn. Pestic. Inf., 57
- 1991, Chem. Abstr., 115, 108 450
- Müller K.‐H., 2002, Pflanzenschutz Nachr. (German Edition), 55, 15
- Santel H. J., 1999, BCPC Conf. Pests Dis., 1, 23
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current Contributions of Organofluorine Compounds to the Agrochemical Industry
Ogawa, Y., Tokunaga, E., Kobayashi, O., Hirai, K., & Shibata, N. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101467 · Cited by 1,253
Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Source for Drug Discovery and Development
Chaachouay, N., & Zidane, L. (2024) · Drugs and Drug Candidates · doi:10.3390/ddc3010011 · Cited by 1,081
Wackett, L. P. (2022) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13928 · Cited by 165
Willach, S., Brauch, H.-J., & Lange, F. T. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.113 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeschke, P.
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-589
- ISSN
- 1439-4227
- 1439-7633
- Cited by
- 1,325
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review