Contribution of selected perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances to the adsorbable organically bound fluorine in German rivers and in a highly contaminated groundwater
Abstract
Due to the lack of analytical standards the application of surrogate parameters for organofluorine detection in the aquatic environment is a complementary approach to single compound target analysis of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFASs). The recently developed method adsorbable organically bound fluorine (AOF) is based on adsorption of organofluorine chemicals to activated carbon followed by combustion ion chromatography. This AOF method was further simplified to enable measurement of larger series of environmental samples. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.77 μg/L F. The modified protocol was applied to 22 samples from German rivers, a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent, and four groundwater samples from a fire-fighting training site. The WWTP effluent (AOF = 1.98 μg/L F) and only three river water samples (AOF between 0.88 μg/L F and 1.47 μg/L F) exceeded the LOQ. The AOF levels in a PFASs plume at a heavily contaminated site were in the range of 162 ± 3 μg/L F to 782 ± 43 μg/L F. In addition to AOF 17 PFASs were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. 32-51% of AOF in the contaminated groundwater samples were explained by individual PFASs wheras in the surface waters more than 95% remained unknown. Organofluorine of two fluorinated pesticides, one pesticide metabolite and three fluorinated pharmaceuticals was recovered as AOF by >50% from all four tested water matrices. It is suggested that in the diffusely contaminated water bodies such fluorinated chemicals and not monitored PFASs contribute significantly to AOF.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Combustion ion chromatography (CIC) and particle induced gamma ray emission (PIGE) have recently been introduced for indirect quantification of total and extractable organic fluorine in samples.
“combustion ion chromatography (CIC) [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and particle induced gamma ray emission (PIGE) 28,37,38 have recently been introduced for indirect quan-tication of total and extractable organic uorine (TF and EOF, respectively) in samples.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Willach, S., Brauch, H.-J., & Lange, F. T.
- Affiliations
- DVGW - Technologiezentrum Wasser (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lange, Frank T.
- ORCID
- Lange, Frank T.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 145
- Pages
- 342-350
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2189996920
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
- Keywords
- per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, river water, groundwater contamination, municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent, fluorinated pesticides, fluorinated drugs, surrogate parameters, activated carbon adsorption, combustion ion chromatography, diffuse contamination
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Carbon, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fluorine, Germany, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Rivers, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Groundwater, Wastewater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review