The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting participation, early onset and later persistence in officially recorded offending
Abstract
Data from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 London males, were analysed to identify predictors of participation (prevalence) in officially recorded offending between ages 10 and 20 years; of early onset (between ages 10 and 13 years) vs later onset of offending (between ages 14 and 20 years); and of persistence vs desistance of offending in adulthood (between ages 21 and 32 years) to investigate whether the same or different variables predicted these different aspects of criminal involvement. Generally, the three crime outcomes were predicted by different variables measured in childhood. Early antisocial behaviour, interaction with antisocial others, temperament (daring and low nervousness), low academic skills (school attainment), poor parental child‐rearing practices and a low level of commitment to the family were independent predictors of participation in offending. In contrast, an early onset of offending was predicted particularly by low paternal involve‐ment with the boy in leisure activities and was negatively related to interaction with antisocial others (parents and siblings). Persistence in crime between ages 21 and 32 years was predicted by low paternal involvement with the boy in leisure activities, a low degree of commitment to school and low verbal IQ at ages 8–10 years. It was not predicted by self‐reported delinquent involvement at age 18, but it was pre‐dicted by heavy drinking and unemployment in the teenage years. The data show the utility of considering different aspects of the ‘criminal career’ separately in seeking to understand and predict crime. Implications of the findings for criminological theories and interventions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
Cited by
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64 · Cited by 5,428
Self-citationMaking good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives.
Maruna, S. (2001) · doi:10.1037/10430-000 · Cited by 3,575
The Relationship Between Parenting and Delinquency: A Meta-analysis
Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8 · Cited by 1,358
Pinquart, M. (2017) · Developmental psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000295 · Cited by 1,339
The development of aggressive behaviour during childhood: What have we learned in the past century?
Tremblay, R. E. (2000) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/016502500383232 · Cited by 842
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrington, D. P., & Hawkins, J. D.
- Venue
- Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 0957-9664 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2857
- OpenAlex
- W2465395259
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.