The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of biobasorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries. Bioabsorbable magnesium stents carry the potential to overcome the limitations posed by permanent metallic stents such as chronic inflammation, late stent thrombosis, prolonged antiplatelet therapy, and artifacts when imaged by multislice-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Magnesium alloy stents or stainless steel stents were randomly deployed in coronary arteries of domestic or minipigs. Domestic pigs were sacrificed at 3 days (n = 2) or 28 days, and minipigs at 3 months. RESULTS: At 3 days, magnesium alloy stents were intact, but started to show signs of degradation by 28 days. There was no evidence of stent particle embolization, thrombosis, excess inflammation, or fibrin deposition. At 28 days and 3 months, neointimal area was significantly less in magnesium alloy stent segments (2.44 +/- 0.88 mm(2) and 1.16 +/- 0.19 mm(2)) as compared with the stainless steel stent segments (5.03 +/- 1.5 mm(2) and 1.72 +/- 0.68 mm(2), P < 0.001 and 0.02). Quantitative coronary analysis indicates that percentage area stenosis and percentage diameter stenosis in magnesium alloy stent segments improved significantly at 3 months as compared to 28 days. Despite decreased neointimal hyperplasia, lumen area of the magnesium alloy stented vessels did not improve significantly. CONCLUSION: Magnesium alloy stents are safe and are associated with less neointima formation; however, reduced neointima did not result in larger lumen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Erbel, R., Di Mario, C., Bartunek, J., Bonnier, J., de Bruyne, B., Eberli, F. R., Erne, P., Haude, M., Heublein, B., Horrigan, M., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60853-8 · Cited by 907
Self-citationBiodegradable Metals for Cardiovascular Stent Application: Interests and New Opportunities
Moravej, M., & Mantovani, D. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12074250 · Cited by 600
Feyerabend, F., Fischer, J., Holtz, J., Witte, F., Willumeit, R., Drücker, H., Vogt, C., & Hort, N. (2010) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.024 · Cited by 598
Biodegradable Metals for Cardiovascular Stents: from Clinical Concerns to Recent Zn‐Alloys
Bowen, P. K., Shearier, E. R., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Zhao, F., Goldman, J., & Drelich, J. W. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201501019 · Cited by 544
Ding, Y., Wen, C., Hodgson, P., & Li, Y. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. B · doi:10.1039/c3tb21746a · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Waksman, R., Pakala, R., Kuchulakanti, P. K., Baffour, R., Hellinga, D., Seabron, R., Tio, F. O., Wittchow, E., Hartwig, S., Harder, C., Rohde, R., Heublein, B., Andreae, A., Waldmann, K.-H., & Haverich, A.
- Venue
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 607-617
- ISSN
- 1522-1946 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-726X
- OpenAlex
- W2043023006
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ccd.20727
- The paper
- Waksman, R., Pakala, R., Kuchulakanti, P. K., Baffour, R., Hellinga, D., Seabron, R., Tio, F. O., Wittchow, E., Hartwig, S., Harder, C., Rohde, R., Heublein, B., Andreae, A., Waldmann, K.-H., & Haverich, A. (2006). Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.