The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A Western Denmark Heart Registry Study
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that associates with a high acute‐phase mortality rate, whereas long‐term outcome is less well described. Objective: To describe the incidence, predictors, and prognosis of SCAD. Design: Retrospective case‐identification study from the Western Denmark Heart Registry and the database of the Forensic Institute at Aarhus University from 1999 through 2007. Results: SCAD was documented in 22 of 32,869 (0.7‰) angiograms in the angiographic registry. The SCAD incidence among cases of ACS was 22 of 11,175 (2.0‰). None was seen in the forensic database. The mean age was 48.7 ± 8.9 years (range: 37–71 years). Females constituted 17 of 22 (77%) patients and all had undergone one or more pregnancies; two cases occurred in the postpartum period. The left descending artery (LAD) was the predominant site of entry. The age distribution, prevalence of the cardiovascular risk factors, presence of coronary atherosclerosis, and entry of the dissection were comparable among genders. Treatment was percutaneous coronary intervention in 13 of 22 (59%), coronary artery bypass operation in 2 of 22 (9%), and medical treatment in 7 of 22 (32%) patients. The mean follow‐up period was 3.6 ± 2.9 years. One patient suffered from recurrent SCAD; another patient died suddenly. The MACE‐ (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and new revascularization) free survival was 81% after 24 months. Conclusion: SCAD is a rare disease that mainly affects younger women. Compared with earlier reports, the prognosis seems to be improved by early diagnosis and interventional treatment. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roffi, M., Patrono, C., Collet, J.-P., Mueller, C., Valgimigli, M., Andreotti, F., Bax, J. J., Borger, M. A., Brotons, C., Chew, D. P., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320 · Cited by 8,261
Collet, J.-P., Thiele, H., Barbato, E., Barthélémy, O., Bauersachs, J., Bhatt, D. L., Dendale, P., Dorobantu, M., Edvardsen, T., Folliguet, T., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575 · Cited by 5,037
Hayes, S. N., Kim, E. S. H., Saw, J., Adlam, D., Arslanian-Engoren, C., Economy, K. E., Ganesh, S. K., Gulati, R., Lindsay, M. E., Mieres, J. H., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000564 · Cited by 1,301
Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Mehta, L. S., Beckie, T. M., DeVon, H. A., Grines, C. L., Krumholz, H. M., Johnson, M. N., Lindley, K. J., Vaccarino, V., Wang, T. Y., Watson, K. E., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000351 · Cited by 1,244
Adlam, D., Alfonso, F., Maas, A., Vrints, C., Writing Committee, al-Hussaini, A., Bueno, H., Capranzano, P., Gevaert, S., Hoole, S. P., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy080 · Cited by 689
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortensen, K. H., Thuesen, L., Kristensen, I. B., & Christiansen, E. H.
- Venue
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-03
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 710-717
- ISSN
- 1522-1946 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-726X
- OpenAlex
- W1964655700
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A Western Denmark Heart Registry Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ccd.22115
- The paper
- Mortensen, K. H., Thuesen, L., Kristensen, I. B., & Christiansen, E. H. (2009). Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A Western Denmark Heart Registry Study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.