The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appropriate Use of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Water Splitting Electrocatalysis
Abstract
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is an efficient tool that reveals the electrochemical characteristics of catalysts, surfaces, interfaces, coatings, and so forth. Use of EIS in different areas of energy research wherever current, potential, and charge determine the performance has become inevitable. Electrocatalytic water splitting is one of such fields focused on generating high purity hydrogen, where EIS is used to correlate the activity trends measuring charge transfer resistances (Rct). In doing so, different conventions are followed. A few perform EIS at the open circuit potential (OCP), a few perform at onset potential or at a potential before onset potential, a few perform at different potentials for different catalysts at which they deliver the same current density, and a large group of people choose a constant potential beyond onset, at which all the studied catalysts show appreciable catalytic activity. Existence of such different practices in using EIS to characterize water splitting electrocatalysts often lead to misinterpretation of the activity trends. Hence, to provide a clear view on the appropriate use of EIS in water splitting electrocatalysis, we have carried out a comparative EIS study on the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity trend of stainless steel 304 (SS‐304), Co, Ni, and Cu foils in 1 M KOH at all the above‐stated conditions and the results showed that the EIS carried out at constant potentials in the catalytic turnover region is appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00470a · Cited by 5,388
Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Sakthikumar, K., Karthick, K., Mishra, S., & Kundu, S. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02479 · Cited by 2,503
Self-citationAnantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Karthick, K., Sam Sankar, S., Sangeetha, K., Karthik, P. E., & Kundu, S. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee03457a · Cited by 1,632
Self-citationMoSe 2 and WSe 2 Nanofilms with Vertically Aligned Molecular Layers on Curved and Rough Surfaces
Wang, H., Kong, D., Johanes, P., Cha, J. J., Zheng, G., Yan, K., Liu, N., & Cui, Y. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl401944f · Cited by 693
Cited by
Ďurovič, M., Hnát, J., & Bouzek, K. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229708 · Cited by 436
Guo, D., Xia, H., Guo, X., Wen, L., Wang, T., Li, X., & Sun, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.426 · Cited by 57
Nguyen, D. N., Phu, T. K. C., Kim, J., Hong, W. T., Kim, J., Roh, S. H., Park, H. S., Chung, C., Choe, W., Shin, H., et al. (2022) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202204797 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Anantharaj, S., & Noda, S.
- Venue
- ChemElectroChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-05-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2297-2308
- ISSN
- 2196-0216 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021712921
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appropriate Use of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Water Splitting Electrocatalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/celc.202000515
- The paper
- Anantharaj, S., & Noda, S. (2020). Appropriate Use of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Water Splitting Electrocatalysis. ChemElectroChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.