Cited by 1,632Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFuel Cells and Related Materials

Precision and correctness in the evaluation of electrocatalytic water splitting: revisiting activity parameters with a critical assessment

Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Karthick, K., Sam Sankar, S., Sangeetha, K., Karthik, P. E., Kundu, Subrata·2018·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

To avoid unnoticed errors made by researchers who are working in the area of nanostructured materials for water splitting, the correct and precise use of evaluation parameters is discussed in detail, stating their acceptability and validity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7ee03457a

Cites

222 of 222 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • iR compensation has to be performed to guarantee that the reaction proceeds under the desired condition and/or to determine the overpotential correctly.

    “potential compensation (iR compensation) has to be performed to guarantee that the reaction proceeds under the desired condition (e.g., in the chronopotentiometry experiments) and/or to determine the overpotential correctly.47,50”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 223 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Karthick, K., Sam Sankar, S., Sangeetha, K., Karthik, P. E., & Kundu, S.
Affiliations
  • Central Electrochemical Research Institute (IN)
  • Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali (IN)
Corresponding author
Kundu, Subrata
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2018
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
744-771
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2787901841
Cited by
1,632
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 163 · 2025: 222 · 2024: 234 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 221 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 33
FWCI
31.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy & Environmental Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
  • University Grants Commission
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
electrochemical water splitting, evaluation metrics, nanostructured electrocatalysts, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review