The DOI matches its Crossref record.
O2‐PLS for qualitative and quantitative analysis in multivariate calibration
Abstract
In this paper the O‐PLS method [1] has been modified to further improve its interpretational functionality to give (a) estimates of the pure constituent profiles in X as well as model (b) the Y‐orthogonal variation in X, (c) the X‐orthogonal variation in Y and (d) the joint X–Y covariation. It is also predictive in both ways, X ↔ Y. We call this the O2‐PLS approach. In earlier papers we discussed the improved interpretation using O‐PLS compared to the partial least squares projections to latent structures (PLS) when systematic Y‐orthogonal variation in X exists, i.e. when a PLS model has more components than the number of Y variables. In this paper we show how the parameters in the PLS model are affected and to what degree the interpretational ability of the PLS components changes with the amount of Y‐orthogonal variation. In both real and synthetic examples, the O2‐PLS method provided improved interpretation of the model and gave a good estimate of the pure constituent profiles, and the prediction ability was similar to the standard PLS model. The method is discussed from geometric and algebraic points of view, and a detailed description of this modified O2‐PLS method is given and reviewed. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification
Bylesjö, M., Rantalainen, M., Cloarec, O., Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., & Trygg, J. (2006) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.1006 · Cited by 1,475
Self-citationAssessment of PLSDA Cross Validation
Westerhuis, J. A., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Smit, S., Vis, D. J., Smilde, A. K., van Velzen, E. J. J., van Duijnhoven, J. P. M., & van Dorsten, F. A. (2008) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0099-6 · Cited by 1,471
Systems biology and multi-omics integration: viewpoints from the metabolomics research community
Pinu, F. R., Beale, D. J., Paten, A. M., Kouremenos, K., Swarup, S., Schirra, H. J., & Wishart, D. (2019) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo9040076 · Cited by 723
O2‐PLS, a two‐block (X–Y) latent variable regression (LVR) method with an integral OSC filter
Trygg, J., & Wold, S. (2003) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.775 · Cited by 339
Self-citationCulture‐independent analysis of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer and polyposis
Scanlan, P. D., Shanahan, F., Clune, Y., Collins, J. K., O'Sullivan, G. C., O'Riordan, M., Holmes, E., Wang, Y., & Marchesi, J. R. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01503.x · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Trygg, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 283-293
- ISSN
- 0886-9383 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-128X
- OpenAlex
- W2061200096
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: O2‐PLS for qualitative and quantitative analysis in multivariate calibration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cem.724
- The paper
- Trygg, J. (2002). O2‐PLS for qualitative and quantitative analysis in multivariate calibration. Journal of Chemometrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.724
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.