The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partial least squares for discrimination
Abstract
Partial least squares (PLS) was not originally designed as a tool for statistical discrimination. In spite of this, applied scientists routinely use PLS for classification and there is substantial empirical evidence to suggest that it performs well in that role. The interesting question is: why can a procedure that is principally designed for overdetermined regression problems locate and emphasize group structure? Using PLS in this manner has heurestic support owing to the relationship between PLS and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and the relationship, in turn, between CCA and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). This paper replaces the heuristics with a formal statistical explanation. As a consequence, it will become clear that PLS is to be preferred over PCA when discrimination is the goal and dimension reduction is needed. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The multivariate calibration problem in chemistry solved by the PLS method
Wold, S., Martens, H., & Wold, H. (1983) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0062108 · Cited by 1,185
Cited by
Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package
Kuhn, M. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v028.i05 · Cited by 8,863
mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration
Rohart, F., Gautier, B., Singh, A., & Lê Cao, K.-A. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752 · Cited by 4,056
Hahn, D. W., & Omenetto, N. (2012) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1366/11-06574 · Cited by 1,497
Assessment of PLSDA Cross Validation
Westerhuis, J. A., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Smit, S., Vis, D. J., Smilde, A. K., van Velzen, E. J. J., van Duijnhoven, J. P. M., & van Dorsten, F. A. (2008) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0099-6 · Cited by 1,471
An introduction to decision tree modeling
Myles, A. J., Feudale, R. N., Liu, Y., Woody, N. A., & Brown, S. D. (2004) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.873 · Cited by 1,355
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, M., & Rayens, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 166-173
- ISSN
- 0886-9383 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-128X
- OpenAlex
- W2164583936
- Cited by
- 2,841
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
