Cited by 8,863

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package

Kuhn, Max·2008·Journal of Statistical Software

Abstract

The caret package, short for classification and regression training, contains numerous tools for developing predictive models using the rich set of models available in R. The package focuses on simplifying model training and tuning across a wide variety of modeling techniques. It also includes methods for pre-processing training data, calculating variable importance, and model visualizations. An example from computational chemistry is used to illustrate the functionality on a real data set and to benchmark the benefits of parallel processing with several types of models.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18637/jss.v028.i05

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The random forest-based transcription clock was trained using random forest regression with tenfold cross validation, three repeats, and a tuneLength of 5.

    “The random forest-based transcription clock was trained on the batch corrected aging reference data set using the caret R package (Kuhn, 2008) and random forest regression with tenfold cross validation, three repeats and a ‘tuneLength’ of 5.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kuhn, M.
Venue
Journal of Statistical Software
Published
2008
Volume
28
Issue
5
ISSN
1548-7660
Cited by
8,863
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review