The DOI matches its Crossref record; 174 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recycling of mixed cathode lithium‐ion batteries for electric vehicles: Current status and future outlook
Open accessAbstract
Worldwide trends in mobile electrification, largely driven by the popularity of electric vehicles (EVs) will skyrocket demands for lithium‐ion battery (LIB) production. As such, up to four million metric tons of LIB waste from EV battery packs could be generated from 2015 to 2040. LIB recycling directly addresses concerns over long‐term economic strains due to the uneven geographic distribution of resources (especially for Co and Li) and environmental issues associated with both landfilling and raw material extraction. However, LIB recycling infrastructure has not been widely adopted, and current facilities are mostly focused on Co recovery for economic gains. This incentive will decline due to shifting market trends from LiCoO 2 toward cobalt‐deficient and mixed‐metal cathodes (eg, LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2). Thus, this review covers recycling strategies to recover metals in mixed‐metal LIB cathodes and comingled scrap comprising different chemistries. As such, hydrometallurgical processes can meet this criterion, while also requiring a low environmental footprint and energy consumption compared to pyrometallurgy. Following pretreatment to separate the cathode from other battery components, the active material is dissolved entirely by reductive acid leaching. A complex leachate is generated, comprising cathode metals (Li+, Ni 2+, Mn 2+, and Co 2+) and impurities (Fe 3+, Al 3+, and Cu 2+) from the current collectors and battery casing, which can be separated and purified using a series of selective precipitation and/or solvent extraction steps. Alternatively, the cathode can be resynthesized directly from the leachate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
P, D. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/0022-2860(92)85083-s · Cited by 9,329
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets
Cano, Z. P., Banham, D., Ye, S., Hintennach, A., Lu, J., Fowler, M., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1 · Cited by 2,873
Self-citationThe lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives
Zubi, G., Dufo-López, R., Carvalho, M., & Pasaoglu, G. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 · Cited by 2,563
True Performance Metrics in Electrochemical Energy Storage
Gogotsi, Y., & Simon, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1213003 · Cited by 2,440
The development and future of lithium ion batteries
Blomgren, G. E. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0251701jes · Cited by 1,940
The Evolution of “sol-Gel” Chemistry as a Technique for Materials Synthesis
Danks, A. E., Hall, S. R., & Schnepp, Z. (2016) · Materials Horizons · doi:10.1039/c5mh00260e · Cited by 1,718
Olivetti, E. A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G. G., & Fu, X. (2017) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 · Cited by 1,572
Automotive Li-Ion Batteries: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Ding, Y., Cano, Z. P., Yu, A., Lu, J., & Chen, Z. (2019) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-018-0022-z · Cited by 1,370
Self-citationCRC Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters: Second Edition
Barton, A. F. M. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140575 · Cited by 1,252
Cited by
Heteroatom Doping: An Effective Way to Boost Sodium Ion Storage
Li, Y., Chen, M., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Liang, X., & Xia, X. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202000927 · Cited by 621
Tabelin, C. B., Dallas, J., Casanova, S., Pelech, T., Bournival, G., Saydam, S., & Canbulat, I. (2021) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743 · Cited by 533
Zinc-ion batteries for stationary energy storage
Gourley, S. W. D., Brown, R., Adams, B. D., & Higgins, D. (2023) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.007 · Cited by 482
Self-citationJin, S., Mu, D., Lu, Z., Li, R., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Tian, S., & Dai, C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130535 · Cited by 361
A contact-electro-catalytic cathode recycling method for spent lithium-ion batteries
Li, H., Berbille, A., Zhao, X., Wang, Z., Tang, W., & Wang, Z. L. (2023) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01348-y · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Or, T., Gourley, S. W. D., Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z.
- Venue
- Carbon Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-43
- ISSN
- 2096-9570 (ISSN-L)
- 2637-9368
- OpenAlex
- W3000328193
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 174
- FWCI
- 35.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recycling of mixed cathode lithium‐ion batteries for electric vehicles: Current status and future outlook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cey2.29
- The paper
- Or, T., Gourley, S. W. D., Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020). Recycling of mixed cathode lithium‐ion batteries for electric vehicles: Current status and future outlook. Carbon Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.