Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non‐UV‐Induced Radical Reactions at the Surface of TiO2 Nanoparticles That May Trigger Toxic Responses

Fenoglio, Ivana, Greco, Giovanna, Livraghi, Stefano, Fubini, Bice·2009·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

Kept in the dark: The non‐photocatalytic generation of free radicals from fine and ultrafine TiO 2 particles has been studied by means of a spin‐trapping/ESR spectroscopy technique (see figure). The amount and kind of free radicals generated depends on the crystalline structure, but not on the particle dimensions.magnified image Titania is generally considered to be an inert and safe material. Several studies, however, have reported that nanosized TiO 2 may elicit toxic effects. In some cases the observed adverse effects have been related to free radicals. Although new studies mainly concern irradiated titania, the role and the mechanisms of the generation of free radicals by TiO 2 in the absence of UV irradiation are not well known. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the free‐radical‐generation mechanisms by nano‐ and micronsized anatase or rutile powders under normal laboratory illumination or in the dark by means of a spin‐trapping/ESR spectroscopy technique. This technique is used to identify the nature and the amount of free radicals released in solution, and in the solid‐state to characterise the paramagnetic centres at the surface of particles that may participate in the reactions. The following radical‐generating mechanisms have been considered: 1) the generation of oxygenated free radicals (HO 2., O 2.−, HO.) following the reaction of TiO 2 with oxygen, water or H 2 O 2 and 2) the generation of carbon‐centred radicals following the cleavage of the CH bond in a model molecule. Although no free radicals were detected in a simply buffered solution, anatase and rutile generated O 2.− and HO., respectively, in the presence of H 2 O 2. Both polymorphs were also active in the cleavage of the CH bond. Although the formation of O 2.− appears to be related to exposure to sunlight, the generation of HO. and carbon‐centred free radicals also occurs in the dark. When samples of equal surface area were tested, micron‐ and nanosized anatase was found to react in the same way indicating that a reduction in diameter does not generate new kinds of reactive sites. The data presented herein may have implications in the assessment of the health risk associated with the exposure to TiO 2 nanoparticles and in the ecotoxicological impact following their possible leakage into the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.200802542

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Fenoglio, I., Greco, G., Livraghi, S., & Fubini, B.
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-17
Volume
15
Issue
18
Pages
4614-4621
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W1964425581
Cited by
187
References
4
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐UV‐Induced Radical Reactions at the Surface of TiO2 Nanoparticles That May Trigger Toxic Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.200802542
The paper
Fenoglio, I., Greco, G., Livraghi, S., & Fubini, B. (2009). Non‐UV‐Induced Radical Reactions at the Surface of TiO2 Nanoparticles That May Trigger Toxic Responses. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200802542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.