The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elucidating Gating Effects for Hydrogen Sorption in MFU‐4‐Type Triazolate‐Based Metal–Organic Frameworks Featuring Different Pore Sizes
Abstract
A highly porous member of isoreticular MFU‐4‐type frameworks, [Zn 5 Cl 4(BTDD)3] (MFU‐4 l(arge)) (H 2‐BTDD=bis(1 H‐1,2,3‐triazolo[4,5‐b],[4′,5′‐i])dibenzo[1,4]dioxin), has been synthesized using ZnCl 2 and H 2‐BTDD in N,N‐dimethylformamide as a solvent. MFU‐4 l represents the first example of MFU‐4‐type frameworks featuring large pore apertures of 9.1 Å. Here, MFU‐4 l serves as a reference compound to evaluate the origin of unique and specific gas‐sorption properties of MFU‐4, reported previously. The latter framework features narrow‐sized pores of 2.5 Å that allow passage of sufficiently small molecules only (such as hydrogen or water), whereas molecules with larger kinetic diameters (e.g., argon or nitrogen) are excluded from uptake. The crystal structure of MFU‐4 l has been solved ab initio by direct methods from 3D electron‐diffraction data acquired from a single nanosized crystal through automated electron diffraction tomography (ADT) in combination with electron‐beam precession. Independently, it has been solved using powder X‐ray diffraction. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and variable‐temperature X‐ray powder diffraction (XRPD) experiments carried out on MFU‐4 l indicate that it is stable up to 500 °C (N 2 atmosphere) and up to 350 °C in air. The framework adsorbs 4 wt % hydrogen at 20 bar and 77 K, which is twice the amount compared to MFU‐4. The isosteric heat of adsorption starts for low surface coverage at 5 kJ mol−1 and decreases to 3.5 kJ mol−1 at higher H 2 uptake. In contrast, MFU‐4 possesses a nearly constant isosteric heat of adsorption of ca. 7 kJ mol−1 over a wide range of surface coverage. Moreover, MFU‐4 exhibits a H 2 desorption maximum at 71 K, which is the highest temperature ever measured for hydrogen physisorbed on metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal Azolate Frameworks: From Crystal Engineering to Functional Materials
Zhang, J.-P., Zhang, Y.-B., Lin, J.-B., & Chen, X.-M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200139g · Cited by 1,733
Metal–Organic Frameworks against Toxic Chemicals
Islamoglu, T., Chen, Z., Wasson, M. C., Buru, C. T., Kirlikovali, K. O., Afrin, U., Mian, M. R., & Farha, O. K. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00828 · Cited by 707
Porous materials for hydrogen storage
Chen, Z., Kirlikovali, K. O., Idrees, K. B., Wasson, M. C., & Farha, O. K. (2022) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.012 · Cited by 543
Bioinspired Framework Catalysts: From Enzyme Immobilization to Biomimetic Catalysis
Wang, K.-Y., Zhang, J., Hsu, Y.-C., Lin, H., Han, Z., Pang, J., Yang, Z., Liang, R.-R., Shi, W., & Zhou, H.-C. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00879 · Cited by 490
Construction and application of base-stable MOFs: a critical review
Wang, K., Li, Y., Xie, L.-H., Li, X., & Li, J.-R. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00891a · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Denysenko, D., Grzywa, M., Tonigold, M., Streppel, B., Krkljus, I., Hirscher, M., Mugnaioli, E., Kolb, U., Hanss, J., & Volkmer, D.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1837-1848
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W2156118804
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elucidating Gating Effects for Hydrogen Sorption in MFU‐4‐Type Triazolate‐Based Metal–Organic Frameworks Featuring Different Pore Sizes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.201001872
- The paper
- Denysenko, D., Grzywa, M., Tonigold, M., Streppel, B., Krkljus, I., Hirscher, M., Mugnaioli, E., Kolb, U., Hanss, J., & Volkmer, D. (2011). Elucidating Gating Effects for Hydrogen Sorption in MFU‐4‐Type Triazolate‐Based Metal–Organic Frameworks Featuring Different Pore Sizes. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201001872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.