Cited by 1Cyclopropane Reaction MechanismsAsymmetric Synthesis and CatalysisSynthesis of Indole Derivatives

ChemInform Abstract: Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Pyrroloindolines via a Rhodium(II)‐Catalyzed Annulation of Indoles.

Spangler, Jillian E., Davies, Huw M. L.·2013·ChemInform

Abstract

Various title compounds are prepared with high levels of enantioinduction via a formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition of C(3)‐substituted indoles and 4‐aryl‐1‐sulfonyl‐1,2,3‐triazoles as carbenoid precursors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chin.201341131

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spangler, J. E., & Davies, H. M. L.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
ChemInform
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-19
Volume
44
Issue
41
ISSN
  • 0009-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 0931-7597
  • 1522-2667
OpenAlex
W2949369063
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ChemInform (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis of Indole Derivatives
Keywords
pyrroloindolines, rhodium(II) catalysis, asymmetric synthesis, indole annulation, [3+2] cycloaddition, 1,2,3-triazoles, enantioinduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review