Using reflective learning to improve the impact of short courses and workshops
Abstract
For a variety of reasons, short courses and workshops often have no impact on workplace practice and are, therefore, a waste of money. The notion of "impact" on work practice is introduced, and it provides a focus toward which all elements on a short course should contribute (including the administrative processes). This article discusses the distinction between teaching and learning and some variables about the quality of the learning process that should be taken into account: the approach the learner takes and the learner's stage of conception of the structure of knowledge. The support of good-quality learning is a principal attribute of good teaching, and the nature of good teaching is discussed on this basis. Teaching and learning in a short course can usefully be structured by a framework to improve the impact of short courses and workshops. This also provides a structure for reflective activities. This article briefly discusses the definition of reflection and considers how it might be implemented. Finally, as another tactic in the focusing on impact, the components of short courses are analyzed on the basis that every component needs to work toward the improvement of the impact of the course.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reflective practices promote students' critical thinking, self-awareness, and self-regulation as they review, question, and evaluate the learning process.
“Reflective practices promote students' critical thinking, self-awareness, and self-regulation as they review, question, and evaluate the learning process in various forms, such as written, verbal, visual, or in groups [25].”
From Beyond the Classroom: Integrating the ORID Model for In-Depth Reflection and Assessment in Service-Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Reflection can serve as a powerful tool for evaluating both the depth of student learning and the effectiveness of teaching practices.
“Reflection can serve as a powerful tool for evaluating both the depth of student learning and the effectiveness of teaching practices [25,35].”
From Beyond the Classroom: Integrating the ORID Model for In-Depth Reflection and Assessment in Service-Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback
Sargeant, J. M., Mann, K. V., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Metsemakers, J. F. (2009) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Vachon, B., Durand, M.-J., & LeBlanc, J. (2010) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9200-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kayan Fadlelmula, F., & Qadhi, S. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090987 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moon, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Moon, Jennifer
- Venue
- Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-11
- ISSN
- 0894-1912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166977881
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- reflective learning, short courses, workshops, learning quality, knowledge structure, good teaching, course design framework, continuing education, health professions education
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Learning, Teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review