Cited by 296Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackReflective Practices in Education

Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback

Sargeant, Joan M., Mann, Karen V., van der Vleuten, Cees P., Metsemakers, Job F.·2009·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

Problem statement and background Feedback is essential to learning and practice improvement, yet challenging both to provide and receive. The purpose of this paper was to explore reflective processes which physicians described as they considered their assessment feedback and the perceived utility of that reflective process.Methods This is a qualitative study using principles of grounded theory. We conducted interviews with 28 family physicians participating in a multi-source feedback program and receiving scores across the spectrum from high to low.Results Feedback, especially negative feedback, evoked reflective responses. Reflection seemed to be the process through which feedback was or was not assimilated and appeared integral to decisions to accept and use the feedback. Facilitated reflection upon feedback was viewed as a positive influence for assimilation and acceptance.Conclusions Receiving feedback inconsistent with self-perceptions stimulated physicians' reflective processes. The process of reflection appeared instrumental to feedback acceptance and use, suggesting that reflection may be an important educational focus in the formative assessment and feedback process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sargeant, J. M., Mann, K. V., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Metsemakers, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Sargeant, Joan M.
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2008-06-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
399-410
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W2081610335
Cited by
296
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  • Dalhousie University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
Keywords
assessment feedback, reflective practice, feedback acceptance, negative feedback, general practitioners, multisource feedback, formative assessment, physician self-perception, professional development
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Feedback, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Physicians, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review