The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring adoption difficulties in mobile banking services
Abstract
Factors associated with adopting and resisting mobile banking technologies were investigated among university students in Taiwan. Adoption factors included the belief that mobile banking helps fulfill personal banking needs, provides location‐free conveniences, and is cost effective. The primary factors associated with resistance included concerns over system configuration security and basic fees for mobile banking web connections. The theoretical and applied implications of these findings are discussed. Copyright © 2009 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
A Rasch model for partial credit scoring
Masters, G. N. (1982) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296272 · Cited by 3,782
Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore
Yang, K. C. C. (2005) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.003 · Cited by 656
Mahler, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/s0308-5961(99)00052-x · Cited by 285
Cited by
Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.024 · Cited by 922
Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M. A., & Popovič, A. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004 · Cited by 808
Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2014) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-12-2012-0244 · Cited by 606
Acceptance of mobile banking in Islamic banks: Evidence from modified UTAUT model
Raza, S. A., Shah, N., & Ali, M. (2019) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-04-2017-0038 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, A. S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-29
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-149
- ISSN
- 0825-0383 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4490
- OpenAlex
- W2075607480
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
