Cited by 170Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsLiver Diseases and Immunity

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Recent Guideline Updates

Open access
Ando, Yumi, Jou, Janice H.·2021·Clinical Liver Disease

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in the United States and in other industrialized nations.Its increase in prevalence and severity correlates with the rise in obesity and the metabolic syndrome, and NAFLD now represents a leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. 1 The rising clinical and economic burden of NAFLD has highlighted the need for a streamlined approach to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease.In this review, we will summarize updated guideline and guidance recommendations for the management of adult NAFLD; highlight key difference between US, Asian, and European recommendations; and provide key updates. KeY UPDaTes TO Us GasTrOenTerOlOGY anD HePaTOlOGY sOCieTY reCOMMenDaTiOns FOr aDUlT naFlDIn 2012, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association published a joint practice guideline on NAFLD. 2 The diagnosis of NAFLD currently requires: (1) evidence of hepatic steatosis (HS) by imaging or histology, (2) no significant alcohol consumption, (3) no competing causes of HS, and (4) no coexisting causes of chronic liver disease.Research efforts have led to significant progress in our understanding of the disease.An updated practice guidance, based on expert consensus rather than by systematic review of the literature,

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cld.1045

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and grading NAFLD.

    “Although liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and grading NAFLD, however, it can not be used as a screening tool [39].”

    From Effectiveness of body roundness index for the prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [39]

    In “How Should NAFLD Be Diagnosed, and How Should It Be Monitored?”, the review calls liver histology the gold standard for distinguishing steatohepatitis from simple steatosis and staging fibrosis. It also says biopsy should be considered only in select individuals because of its invasiveness and cost, supporting the screening limitation. It does not call biopsy the gold standard for diagnosing NAFLD generally; the review says diagnosis can use imaging or histology. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. review steatohepatitis, and fibrosis in a cost-effective and mini- mally invasive manner.
  2. Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults await- ing liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015;148:547-555.
  3. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and man- agement of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012;55:2005-2023.
  4. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and manage- ment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67:328-357.
  5. Targher G, Byrne CD, Lonardo A, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver dis- ease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2016;65:589-600.
  6. Wong RJ, Tran T, Kaufman H, et al. Increasing metabolic co-morbid- ities are associated with higher risk of advanced fibrosis in nonalco- holic steatohepatitis. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220612.
  7. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2015;149:389-397.e10.
  8. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, International Consensus Panel. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2020;158:1999-2014.e1.
  9. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, European Association for the Study of Obesity. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2016;64:1388-1402.
  10. Wong VW, Chan WK, Chitturi S, et al. Asia-Pacific Working Party on Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease guidelines 2017-Part 1: definition, risk factors and assessment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:70-85.
  11. Chitturi S, Wong VW, Chan WK, et al. The Asia-Pacific Working Party on Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease guidelines 2017-Part 2: management and special groups. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:86-98.
  12. Liu CJ. Prevalence and risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver dis- ease in Asian people who are not obese. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;27:1555-1560.
  13. Dasarathy S, Dasarathy J, Khiyami A, et al. Validity of real time ul- trasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2009;51:1061-1067.
  14. Blais P, Husain N, Kramer JR, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is underrecognized in the primary care setting. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:10-14.
  15. Alexander M, Loomis AK, Fairburn-Beech J, et al. Real-world data re- veal a diagnostic gap in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Med 2018;16:130.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ando, Y., & Jou, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health and Science University Hospital (US)
  • Portland VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jou, Janice H.
Venue
Clinical Liver Disease
Published
2021-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
23-28
ISSN
2046-2484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127981559
Cited by
170
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 20
FWCI
26.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, guideline revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review