Cited by 8Mast cells and histamineFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Detection of clonal mast cell disease in wasp venom allergic patients with normal tryptase

Open access
Onnes, Merel C., Alheraky, Abdulrazzaq, Nawijn, Martijn C., Sluijter, Tim E., Mulder, André B., Arends, Suzanne, Oude Elberink, Hanneke N. G.·2022·Clinical and Translational Allergy

Abstract

Abstract Background Clonal mast cell disease (CMD) is an underlying aggravating condition in wasp venom allergy (WVA) which requires a different treatment strategy. CMD is increasingly recognized in patients with normal basal serum tryptase (bsT). However, methods to identify at risk patients have not yet been assessed in large cohorts of WVA patients with normal bsT. Methods This retrospective study evaluated the reliability of the REMA score in detecting CMD in a cohort of grade IV WVA patients with normal bsT and assessed the added value of other clinical parameters, KIT D816V mutation analysis in peripheral blood (PB) and the diagnosis of hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT). All patients had a conclusive bone marrow evaluation that demonstrated or excluded underlying CMD. Results In total 35 CMD and 96 non‐CMD patients were included. REMA score had a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI 56%–88%) and specificity of 79% (95% CI 70%–87%) in this cohort. Loss of consciousness during systemic reaction and bsT between 6.3 and 11.4 ng/ml were additional parameters independently associated with CMD. Sensitivity of KIT in PB was relatively low, 56% (95% CI 36%–75%), but had added value as screening method in patients with a low REMA score due to 100% specificity. Conclusion The REMA score is a relatively reliable method to detect patients at risk of CMD among WVA patients with normal bsT. KIT mutation analysis in PB could serve as additional screening method in patients with low REMA scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/clt2.12174

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even with a highly sensitive test, a negative result for the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood would not exclude underlying primary mast cell disorder, since this has a low negative predictive value.

    “Importantly, even with a highly sensitive test, a negative result for the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood would not exclude underlying PMCD, since this has a low negative predictive value [68,69].”

    From Diagnostic Significance of Tryptase for Suspected Mast Cell Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results (KIT D816V mutation analysis in peripheral blood; page unavailable) report 55.6% sensitivity and patients with clonal mast cell disease who tested negative in peripheral blood, supporting the point that a negative result does not exclude disease. The study examined wasp-venom-allergic patients with normal basal tryptase; it does not report a negative predictive value or establish the claim for primary mast cell disorders generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onnes, M. C., Alheraky, A., Nawijn, M. C., Sluijter, T. E., Mulder, A. B., Arends, S., & Oude Elberink, H. N. G.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Internal Medicine Division of Allergology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Onnes, Merel C.
Venue
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
e12174-e12174
ISSN
2045-7022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294936157
Cited by
8
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Allergy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
wasp venom allergy, KIT D816V mutation, hereditary alpha-tryptasemia, screening, bone marrow examination, systemic reactions, mast cell activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review