Cited by 64Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Interaction between kinesin, microtubules, and microtubule-associated protein 2

von Massow, Alexander, Mandelkow, Eva‐Maria, Mandelkow, Eckhard·1989·Cell Motility

Abstract

Kinesin from porcine brain was prepared by a procedure based on the strong binding of the protein to microtubules in the presence of sodium fluoride and ATP. The protocol reduces the requirement for taxol and AMP-PNP. The kinesin is active in terms of its ability to move microtubules on glass slides and its ATPase. The ATPase of this kinesin is about 8 nmol/min/mg; it is activated to 19 nmol/min/mg in the presence of microtubules. The relationship between gliding velocity and ATP concentration follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Using the motility assay, the maximal velocity is 0.78 micron/sec, and the Km value is 150 microM for ATP. For GTP the corresponding values are 0.38 micron/sec and 1.7 mM. ADP is a competitive inhibitor (Ki = 0.29 mM). Crude preparations of kinesin do not support motility on glass slides, whereas gel-filtered kinesin does. A search for potential inhibitory factors showed that one of them is MAP2; however, its inhibitory effect becomes visible only in certain conditions. MAP2 bound to microtubules does not inhibit kinesin-induced motility. However, when MAP2 and kinesin are preadsorbed to the glass surface independently of microtubules, MAP2 prevents the interaction of kinesin with microtubules, as if it formed a "lawn" that acted as a spacer and thus repelled the MAP-free microtubules or crosslinked the MAP-containing ones. The repelling effect of MAP2 domains (projection or assembly fragments obtained by chymotryptic cleavage) added separately is less…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cm.970140413

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Massow, A., Mandelkow, E., & Mandelkow, E.
Affiliations
Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology (DE)
Venue
Cell Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
562-571
ISSN
0886-1544 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069677899
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Desy publication database (The Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
kinesin, microtubules, MAP2, kinesin motility, ATPase activity, microtubule gliding, ATP inhibition, GTP, ADP, spacer molecules, porcine brain
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphatases, Animals, Brain, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Histocytochemistry, Kinetics, Microtubule Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Movement, Sodium Fluoride, Swine, Kinesins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review