The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon‐alpha‐2b formulation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: PEG Intron (pegylated interferon‐alpha‐2b [IFN‐α‐2b]; Schering‐Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) has demonstrated delayed clearance and increased area under the curve compared with native IFN‐α‐2b. Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and malignancies have demonstrated both biologic and clinical activity of PEG Intron and have provided empiric data to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of PEG Intron and IFN‐α‐2b. METHODS: The authors conducted a review of the available data comparing the PK and pharmacodynamic effects of PEG Intron and IFN‐α‐2b. Safety and efficacy data from Phase I/II studies of PEG Intron in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and solid tumors were also reviewed. RESULTS: Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C infection suggest that exposure to IFN at a PEG Intron dose of 0.25 μg/kg per week is similar to that observed after administration of IFN‐α‐2b at a dose of 3 million International Units, three times per week. PEG Intron at doses up to 6 μg/kg per week was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in patients with CML and solid tumors, including metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Dose intensification can be achieved safely in patients with CML and solid tumors using PEG Intron, which could improve efficacy. These results provide useful dosing guidelines to clinicians investigating the antitumor activity of PEG Intron in patients with malignancies. More data are needed to determine the optimal dose in various oncologic indications. However, these results provide a sound rationale for further investigation of PEG Intron. Cancer 2002;95:389–96. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10663
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eggermont, A. M., Suciu, S., Santinami, M., Testori, A., Kruit, W. H., Marsden, J., Punt, C. J., Salès, F., Gore, M., MacKie, R., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61033-8 · Cited by 640
Ibrahim, M., Ramadan, E., Elsadek, N. E., Emam, S. E., Shimizu, T., Ando, H., Ishima, Y., Elgarhy, O. H., Sarhan, H. A., Hussein, A. K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.031 · Cited by 465
PEG conjugates in clinical development or use as anticancer agents: An overview
Pasut, G., & Veronese, F. M. (2009) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2009.02.010 · Cited by 457
Bielack, S. S., Smeland, S., Whelan, J. S., Marina, N., Jovic, G., Hook, J. M., Krailo, M. D., Gebhardt, M., Pápai, Z., Meyer, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.60.0734 · Cited by 422
Pegylated interferon-α protects type 1 pneumocytes against SARS coronavirus infection in macaques
Haagmans, B. L., Kuiken, T., Martina, B. E., Fouchier, R. A. M., Rimmelzwaan, G. F., van Amerongen, G., van Riel, D., de Jong, T., Itamura, S., Chan, K.-H., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1001 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Bukowski, R. M., Tendler, C., Cutler, D., Rose, E., Laughlin, M. M., & Statkevich, P.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07-11
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 389-396
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2019465287
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon‐alpha‐2b formulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.10663
- The paper
- Bukowski, R. M., Tendler, C., Cutler, D., Rose, E., Laughlin, M. M., & Statkevich, P. (2002). Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon‐alpha‐2b formulation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.