Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon‐alpha‐2b formulation

Bukowski, Ronald M., Tendler, Craig, Cutler, David, Rose, Esther, Laughlin, Mark M., Statkevich, Paul·2002·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PEG Intron (pegylated interferon‐alpha‐2b [IFN‐α‐2b]; Schering‐Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) has demonstrated delayed clearance and increased area under the curve compared with native IFN‐α‐2b. Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and malignancies have demonstrated both biologic and clinical activity of PEG Intron and have provided empiric data to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of PEG Intron and IFN‐α‐2b. METHODS: The authors conducted a review of the available data comparing the PK and pharmacodynamic effects of PEG Intron and IFN‐α‐2b. Safety and efficacy data from Phase I/II studies of PEG Intron in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and solid tumors were also reviewed. RESULTS: Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C infection suggest that exposure to IFN at a PEG Intron dose of 0.25 μg/kg per week is similar to that observed after administration of IFN‐α‐2b at a dose of 3 million International Units, three times per week. PEG Intron at doses up to 6 μg/kg per week was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in patients with CML and solid tumors, including metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Dose intensification can be achieved safely in patients with CML and solid tumors using PEG Intron, which could improve efficacy. These results provide useful dosing guidelines to clinicians investigating the antitumor activity of PEG Intron in patients with malignancies. More data are needed to determine the optimal dose in various oncologic indications. However, these results provide a sound rationale for further investigation of PEG Intron. Cancer 2002;95:389–96. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10663

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.10663

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Bukowski, R. M., Tendler, C., Cutler, D., Rose, E., Laughlin, M. M., & Statkevich, P.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-11
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
389-396
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2019465287
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon‐alpha‐2b formulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.10663
The paper
Bukowski, R. M., Tendler, C., Cutler, D., Rose, E., Laughlin, M. M., & Statkevich, P. (2002). Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon‐alpha‐2b formulation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10663

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.