The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis of neck recurrences in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The follow‐up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is traditionally carried out with 131 I whole body scan (131 I WBS) and serum thyroglobulin (Tg) measurement. Neck ultrasonography (US) is also used. METHODS: We compared the roles of Tg measurement (IRMA assay) after l‐thyroxine (T4) withdrawal, 131 I WBS, and US in the diagnosis of DTC neck recurrences. Diagnosis of DTC neck recurrences was based on fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or on histologic results. Four hundred ninety‐four DTC patients (120 males, 374 females; mean age, 49.3 years), submitted to total thyroidectomy and subsequent radioablative 131 I treatment, underwent serum Tg measurement off T4 therapy, 131 I WBS, and neck US at our institution. Mean (± SD) follow‐up time was 55.1 ± 37.7 months. Neck DTC recurrences were detected in 51 (10.3%) patients (34 females, 17 males; mean age, 49.5 years). RESULTS: Neck recurrences occurred after 44.6 ± 21.4 months from initial treatment. Serum Tg levels increased (≥ 2 ng/mL) off T4 therapy in 29 patients (sensitivity 56.8%), 131 I WBS showed neck uptake in 23 patients (sensitivity 45.1%) and coexisting distant metastases were detected in 9 of 23 patients, and US identified neck recurrence in 48 patients (sensitivity 94.1%). Of these 48 neck recurrences, 19 were found in the laterocervical compartment and 29 in the central neck compartment. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional techniques for the surveillance of DTC patients are not as sensitive as US in the detection of neck recurrences. Neck US detects recurrences in patients with undetectable serum Tg levels and negative IWBS and should be performed as the first‐line test in the follow‐up of all DTC patients. Cancer 2003;97:90–6. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11031
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Francis, G. L., Waguespack, S. G., Bauer, A. J., Angelos, P., Benvenga, S., Cerutti, J. M., Dinauer, C. A., Hamilton, J., Hay, I. D., Luster, M., et al. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0460 · Cited by 1,238
Nodal yield, morbidity, and recurrence after central neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma
Pereira, J. A., Jimeno, J., Miquel, J., Iglesias, M., Munné, A., Sancho, J. J., & Sitges-Serra, A. (2005) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.013 · Cited by 337
Biochemical Testing in Thyroid Disorders
Esfandiari, N. H., & Papaleontiou, M. (2017) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2017.04.002 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Frasoldati, A., Pesenti, M., Gallo, M., Caroggio, A., Salvo, D., & Valcavi, R.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-18
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-96
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2088238681
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of neck recurrences in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11031
- The paper
- Frasoldati, A., Pesenti, M., Gallo, M., Caroggio, A., Salvo, D., & Valcavi, R. (2003). Diagnosis of neck recurrences in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.