The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The age specific breast cancer incidence rate for African‐American women under age 35 is more than twice the rate for white women of similar age, and the mortality rate is more than three times higher. To determine factors that may explain racial/ethnic variation in outcomes among young women diagnosed with breast cancer, the authors examined the clinical presentation, treatment, and survival of African‐American, Hispanic, and white women under age 35 years. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data for 1990–1998 and SEER Patterns of Care data for 1990, 1991, and 1995 were used for this analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with the receipt of selected breast cancer treatments. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to examine 5‐year overall survival and disease‐specific survival. RESULTS: The authors found racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival. Both African‐American and Hispanic women presented with higher disease stage and a higher prevalence of adverse prognostic indicators compared to white women. African‐American and Hispanic women received cancer‐directed surgery and radiation less frequently after undergoing breast‐conserving surgery. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical presentation and treatment were associated with poorer overall survival in unadjusted analyses. African‐American and Hispanic women also had poorer overall survival after controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics and type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Future research studies should further examine the factors that influence racial/ethnic differences in incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment differentials among young women diagnosed with breast cancer. A better understanding of these factors will facilitate the development of strategies to help eliminate this health disparity. Cancer 2003;97:134–47. Published 2003 by the American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11051
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Ries, L. A. G., Harkins, D., Krapcho, M. F., Mariotto, A. B., Miller, B., Feuer, E. J., Clegg, L. X., Eisner, M. P., Horner, M., Howlader, N., et al. (2006) · Digital Archive @ GSU · Cited by 11,403
(1968) · American Association of Industrial Nurses Journal · doi:10.1177/216507996801601208 · Cited by 8,798
Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Breast Cancer Treatment and Survival
Bradley, C. J. (2002) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/94.7.490 · Cited by 658
Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2000
(2000) · Cancer Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.82001.x · Cited by 508
Elledge, R. M., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., & Osborne, C. K. (1994) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/86.9.705 · Cited by 414
Younger women with breast carcinoma have a poorer prognosis than older women
Chung, M., Chang, H. R., Bland, K. I., & Wanebo, H. J. (1996) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<97::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 382
Factors Associated With Surgical and Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women
Ballard-Barbash, R., Potosky, A. L., Harlan, L. C., Nayfield, S. G., & Kessler, L. G. (1996) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/88.11.716 · Cited by 374
Self-citationFatalism among elderly African Americans: Effects on colorectal cancer screening
Powe, B. D. (1995) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-199510000-00008 · Cited by 335
The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer
Fowble, B. L., Schultz, D. J., Overmoyer, B., Solin, L. J., Fox, K., Jardines, L., Orel, S., & Glick, J. H. (1994) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)90515-0 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Bauer, K. R., Brown, M., Cress, R. D., Parise, C. A., & Caggiano, V. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22618 · Cited by 2,067
Missed Opportunities: Racial Disparities in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment
Bickell, N. A., Wang, J. J., Oluwole, S., Schrag, D., Godfrey, H., Hiotis, K., Mendez, J., & Guth, A. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.5799 · Cited by 363
Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Baxter, N. N., Virnig, B. A., Durham, S. B., & Tuttle, T. M. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh069 · Cited by 334
Theofilou, P., & Panagiotaki, H. (2012) · Oncology Reviews · doi:10.4081/oncol.2012.e5 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Shavers, V. L., Harlan, L. C., & Stevens, J. L.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-18
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-147
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1980258332
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11051
- The paper
- Shavers, V. L., Harlan, L. C., & Stevens, J. L. (2003). Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.