The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tumor Biologic Factors and Breast Cancer Prognosis Among White, Hispanic, and Black Women in the United States
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, prognosis and survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer is poorer among black patients and, to a lesser extent, among Hispanic patients, compared with white patients. Patients who are black or Hispanic have been reported to present with higher stage or more advanced disease. Even after adjusting for stage, however, survival rates are lower for blacks but not for Hispanics. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare survival, age, tumor size, nodal status, estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) status, histologic type, S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy status, HER-2/neu protein expression, and p53 protein status, along with systemic treatment, in a large group of white, black, and Hispanic U.S. women. METHODS: From 1970 to 1991, breast tumor specimens were submitted to The University of Texas Health Science Center from 31 contributing hospitals throughout the United States for ER and PgR assay. A total of 4885 white, 1016 black, and 777 Hispanic women were eligible for this study. Median follow-up was 57 months. RESULTS: Overall, white women were significantly more likely to be older and to have smaller tumors, have less lymph node involvement, have tumors with positive ER and PgR status, and have a lower S-phase fraction compared with Hispanic or black women. There were no clinically important differences in DNA ploidy, histologic type, HER-2/neu, and p53 expression among the three groups. Considering all stages, white women had the best overall survival (date of diagnosis to date of death) at 5 years--75% +/- 1% (means +/- SE), with a median survival of 166 months, but Hispanic women had an intermediate survival--70% +/- 2% (median survival, 156 months), and black women had the worst survival--65% +/- 2% (median survival, 117 months) (P < .0001). For node-negative patients, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (date of diagnosis to date of first recurrence) or overall survival, although blacks tended to have a worse prognosis. For node-positive or locally advanced disease and for metastatic disease, blacks had significantly (P < .0001) worse disease-free and overall survival than did white or Hispanic women. Differences in the use of systemic therapy did not explain these outcomes. CONCLUSION: A number of biologic factors associated with poor prognosis are found with a significantly increased frequency in breast tumors from Hispanic and, particularly, from black women. Tumors with a more aggressive biology could lead to a higher stage at diagnosis and a poorer survival for the group as a whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer
Yedjou, C. G., Sims, J. N., Miele, L., Noubissi, F., Lowe, L., Fonseca, D. D., Alo, R. A., Payton, M., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3 · Cited by 509
Selvin, E., & Brett, K. M. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.618 · Cited by 304
Lin, S. S., & Kelsey, J. L. (2000) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a018032 · Cited by 237
Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance
Rauscher, G. H., Allgood, K. L., Whitman, S., & Conant, E. (2012) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2415 · Cited by 128
Jones, B. A., Dailey, A., Calvocoressi, L., Reams, K., Kasl, S. V., Lee, C., & Hsu, H. (2005) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-005-2905-7 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Elledge, R. M., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., & Osborne, C. K.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-05-04
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 705-712
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2111966412
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor Biologic Factors and Breast Cancer Prognosis Among White, Hispanic, and Black Women in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/86.9.705
- The paper
- Elledge, R. M., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., & Osborne, C. K. (1994). Tumor Biologic Factors and Breast Cancer Prognosis Among White, Hispanic, and Black Women in the United States. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/86.9.705
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.