The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: A retrospective analysis of three trials
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin is a highly effective and widely used cytotoxic agent with application that is limited by cardiotoxicity related to the cumulative dose of the drug. A large‐scale study that retrospectively evaluated the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin reported that an estimated 7% of patients developed doxorubicin‐related congestive heart failure (CHF) after a cumulative dose of 550 mg/m 2. To assess whether this estimate is reflective of the incidence in the broader clinical oncology setting, the authors evaluated data from three prospective studies to determine both the incidence of doxorubicin‐related CHF and the accumulated dose of doxorubicin at which CHF occurs. METHODS: A group of 630 patients who were randomized to a doxorubicin‐plus‐placebo arm of three Phase III studies, two studies in patients with breast carcinoma and one study in patients with small cell lung carcinoma, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Thirty‐two of 630 patients had a diagnosis of CHF. Analysis indicated that an estimated cumulative 26% of patients would experience doxorubicin‐related CHF at a cumulative dose of 550 mg/m 2. Age appeared to be an important risk factor for doxorubicin‐related CHF after a cumulative dose of 400 mg/m 2, with older patients (age > 65 years) showing a greater incidence of CHF compared with younger patients (age ≤ 65 years). In addition, > 50% of the patients who experienced doxorubicin‐related CHF had a reduction < 30% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while they were on study. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin‐related CHF occurs with greater frequency and at a lower cumulative dose than previously reported. These findings further indicate that LVEF is not an accurate predictor of CHF in patients who receive doxorubicin. Cancer 2003;97:2869–79. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11407
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects
Thorn, C. F., Oshiro, C., Marsh, S., Hernandez-Boussard, T., McLeod, H., Klein, T. E., & Altman, R. B. (2011) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/fpc.0b013e32833ffb56 · Cited by 1,648
Curigliano, G., Lenihan, D., Fradley, M., Ganatra, S., Barac, A., Blaes, A., Herrmann, J., Porter, C., Lyon, A. R., Lancellotti, P., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.023 · Cited by 1,031
Redox regulation of mitochondrial function
Handy, D. E., & Loscalzo, J. (2012) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2011.4123 · Cited by 588
Gorini, S., De Angelis, A., Berrino, L., Malara, N., Rosano, G., & Ferraro, E. (2018) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2018/7582730 · Cited by 325
Cardiovascular toxicity caused by cancer treatment: strategies for early detection
Altena, R., Perik, P. J., van Veldhuisen, D. J., de Vries, E. G., & Gietema, J. A. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70042-7 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Swain, S. M., Whaley, F. S., & Ewer, M. S.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-19
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2869-2879
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1492360552
- Cited by
- 2,313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: A retrospective analysis of three trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11407
- The paper
- Swain, S. M., Whaley, F. S., & Ewer, M. S. (2003). Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: A retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.