The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of initial disease recurrence after resection of gallbladder carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for adjuvant therapeutic strategies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Current approaches to adjuvant treatment after resection of gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA) and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) are based on an incomplete understanding of the recurrence patterns of these diseases. Through an in‐depth analysis of the sites of initial recurrence after resection of GBCA and HCCA, the current study aimed to highlight differences in the biology of these tumors and to provide further insight for adjuvant therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Patients with either GBCA or HCCA who underwent a potentially curative resection were identified prospectively from a maintained database. Specific sites of initial disease recurrence were identified retrospectively and categorized as locoregional (resection margin, porta hepatis, or retroperitoneal lymph nodes) or distant (peritoneal, extraabdominal, or discontiguous liver metastases). Differences in disease recurrence patterns, time to disease recurrence, and overall and site‐specific survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Between May 1990 and August 2001, 177 patients underwent potentially curative resection, 97 for GBCA and 80 for HCCA. Disease recurrence and follow‐up data were available for 156 patients (80 with GBCA and 76 with HCCA). The median time to disease recurrence was shorter for patients with GBCA compared with patients with HCCA (11.5 vs. 20.3 months; P = 0.007). Overall, 52 (68%) patients with HCCA and 53 (66%) patients with GBCA had disease recurrene at a median follow‐up of 24 months. Of those who developed disease recurrence, isolated locoregional disease as the first site of failure occurred in 15% of patients with GBCA compared with 59% of patients with HCCA (P < 0.001). By contrast, an initial GBCA recurrence involving a distant site, with or without concomitant locoregional recurrence, occurred in 85% of patients compared with 41% of patients with HCCA (P < 0.001). This pattern of disease recurrence was diagnosis specific and did not change significantly when patients were stratified by several clinicopathologic factors, including disease stage and its component variables. Using multivariate analysis, diagnosis was an independent predictor of the site of disease recurrence. Among patients who experienced disease recurrence, survival was greater among the patients with HCCA compared with patients with GBCA (29 months vs. 20.6 months, respectively; P = 0.037). For both tumors, the site of initial disease recurrence had no apparent impact on survival time. CONCLUSIONS: After resection, recurrent GBCA is much more likely than recurrent HCCA to involve a distant site. GBCA is also associated with a much shorter time to recurrence and a shorter survival period after recurrence. The results demonstrated significant differences in the clinical behavior of these tumors and suggested that an adjuvant therapeutic strategy targeting locoregional disease, such as radiotherapy, is unlikely to have a significant impact in the overall management of GBCA. Conversely, there is at least some rationale for such an approach in patients with HCCA based on the pattern of initial recurrence. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11699
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rea, D. J., Heimbach, J. K., Rosen, C. B., Haddock, M. G., Alberts, S. R., Kremers, W. K., Gores, G. J., & Nagorney, D. M. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000179678.13285.fa · Cited by 693
Darwish Murad, S., Kim, W. R., Harnois, D. M., Douglas, D. D., Burton, J., Kulik, L. M., Botha, J. F., Mezrich, J. D., Chapman, W. C., Schwartz, J. J., et al. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.008 · Cited by 597
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement
Mansour, J. C., Aloia, T. A., Crane, C. H., Heimbach, J. K., Nagino, M., & Vauthey, J.-N. (2015) · HPB · doi:10.1111/hpb.12450 · Cited by 414
Ben-Josef, E., Guthrie, K. A., El-Khoueiry, A. B., Corless, C. L., Zalupski, M. M., Lowy, A. M., Thomas, C. R., Alberts, S. R., Dawson, L. A., Micetich, K. C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.60.2219 · Cited by 420
Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma
Rosen, C. B., Heimbach, J. K., & Gores, G. J. (2010) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01108.x · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarnagin, W. R., Ruo, L., Little, S. A., Klimstra, D., D'Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Wagman, R., Blumgart, L. H., & Fong, Y.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-21
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1689-1700
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2059922433
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of initial disease recurrence after resection of gallbladder carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for adjuvant therapeutic strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11699
- The paper
- Jarnagin, W. R., Ruo, L., Little, S. A., Klimstra, D., D'Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Wagman, R., Blumgart, L. H., & Fong, Y. (2003). Patterns of initial disease recurrence after resection of gallbladder carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for adjuvant therapeutic strategies. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.