Cited by 414Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement

Open access
Mansour, John C., Aloia, Thomas A., Crane, Christopher H., Heimbach, Julie K., Nagino, Masato, Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas·2015·HPB

Abstract

An American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA)-sponsored consensus meeting of expert panellists met on 15 January 2014 to review current evidence on the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to establish practice guidelines and to agree consensus statements. It was established that the treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to optimize the chances for both durable survival and effective palliation. An adequate diagnostic and staging work-up includes high-quality cross-sectional imaging; however, pathologic confirmation is not required prior to resection or initiation of a liver transplant trimodal treatment protocol. The ideal treatment for suitable patients with resectable hilar malignancy is resection of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, as well as resection of the involved ipsilateral liver. Preoperative biliary drainage is best achieved with percutaneous transhepatic approaches and may be indicated for patients with cholangitis, malnutrition or hepatic insufficiency. Portal vein embolization is a safe and effective strategy for increasing the future liver remnant (FLR) and is particularly useful for patients with an FLR of <30%. Selected patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma should be evaluated for a standard trimodal protocol incorporating external beam and endoluminal radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy and liver transplantation. Post-resection chemoradiation should be offered to patients who show high-risk features on surgical pathology. Chemoradiation is also recommended for patients with locally advanced, unresectable hilar cancers. For patients with locally recurrent or metastatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma, first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is recommended based on multiple Phase II trials and a large randomized controlled trial including a heterogeneous population of patients with biliary cancers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hpb.12450

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients without underlying chronic liver disease, overall survival after resection for hilar CCA is around 27-45% at 5 years with negative margins and 0-23% with positive margins.

    “In patients without underlying chronic liver disease, overall survival rates after resection for hilar CCA are reported to be around 27-45% at 5 years with negative tumour margins (R0) and 0-23% in patients with positive margins.326”

    From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis (2022) · cites this paper as [326]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mansour, J. C., Aloia, T. A., Crane, C. H., Heimbach, J. K., Nagino, M., & Vauthey, J.-N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Mansour, John C.
Venue
HPB
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
691-699
ISSN
1365-182X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1741750461
Cited by
414
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5
FWCI
31.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HPB (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Keywords
hilar cholangiocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, multidisciplinary management, surgical resection, liver transplantation, trimodality therapy, chemoradiotherapy, preoperative biliary drainage, portal vein embolization, future liver remnant, unresectable disease, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, palliative care
MeSH terms
Bile Duct Neoplasms, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drainage, Hepatectomy, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Risk Factors, Societies, Medical, United States, Stents, Incidence, Liver Transplantation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Klatskin Tumor, Consensus, Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review