The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early‐stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function: A longitudinal study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited knowledge exists concerning the impact of radical hysterectomy (RH) alone on the sexual function of patients with early‐stage cervical carcinoma. The authors investigated the longitudinal course of self‐reported sexual function after RH. METHODS: The current study was comprised of 173 patients with lymph node‐negative, early‐stage cervical carcinoma who had undergone RH and pelvic lymphadenectomy. They were assessed prospectively using a validated self‐assessment questionnaire 5 weeks and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months after RH. Results were compared with an age‐matched control group from the general population. RESULTS: Compared with control women, patients experienced severe orgasmic problems and uncomfortable sexual intercourse due to a reduced vaginal size during the first 6 months after RH, severe dyspareunia during the first 3 months, and sexual dissatisfaction during the 5 weeks after RH. A persistent lack of sexual interest and lubrication were reported throughout the first 2 years after RH. Long‐term lack of sexual interest and insufficient vaginal lubrication were confirmed by the patient's self‐reported changes 12 months after RH compared with before the cancer diagnosis and by a pre‐post comparison within patients. However, most of the patients who were sexually active before their cancer diagnosis were sexually active again 12 months after surgery (91%), although with a decrease in sexual frequency reported. CONCLUSIONS: RH had a persistent and negative impact on patients' sexual interest and vaginal lubrication whereas the majority of other sexual and vaginal problems disappeared over time. Sexual and vaginal problems in the short‐term and long‐term after RH should be discussed with the patient before and after surgery. Cancer 2004;100:97–106. © 2003 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
Perneger, T. V. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 · Cited by 5,900
Quality of life and mood in women with gynecologic cancer: A one year prospective study
Lutgendorf, S. K., Anderson, B., Ullrich, P., Johnsen, E. L., Buller, R. E., Sood, A. K., Sorosky, J. I., & Ritchie, J. (2002) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.10155 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Sexuality in Adult Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Intervention
Bober, S. L., & Varela, V. S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.41.7915 · Cited by 448
Sadovsky, R., Basson, R., Krychman, M., Morales, A. M., Schover, L., Wang, R., & Incrocci, L. (2010) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01620.x · Cited by 310
A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors
Abbott-Anderson, K., & Kwekkeboom, K. L. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030 · Cited by 263
Sexuality and Fertility after Cancer
Schover, L. R. (2005) · Hematology · doi:10.1182/asheducation-2005.1.523 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, P. T., Groenvold, M., Klee, M. C., Thranov, I., Petersen, M. A., & Machin, D.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-17
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-106
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1966805964
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early‐stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function: A longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11877
- The paper
- Jensen, P. T., Groenvold, M., Klee, M. C., Thranov, I., Petersen, M. A., & Machin, D. (2004). Early‐stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function: A longitudinal study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.