Cited by 142Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Quality of life and mood in women with gynecologic cancer: A one year prospective study

Open access
Lutgendorf, Susan K., Anderson, Barrie, Ullrich, Philip, Johnsen, Erica L., Buller, Richard E., Sood, Anil K., Sorosky, Joel I., Ritchie, Justine·2002·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) and mood were prospectively investigated during the first year of treatment among women with gynecologic cancers. Relationships of coping styles to QOL and mood were examined. METHODS: Ninety‐eight patients with early stage or regionally advanced gynecologic cancers were recruited. Mood and QOL were assessed at initial clinic visit and at one year, and medical information was abstracted from charts at both time‐points. RESULTS: Although decrements in physical, functional, and total well‐being were reported at baseline by regionally advanced patients, by one year, all patients reported significant improvements in QOL and mood. There were no differences between early stage and regionally advanced patients in their improvement for these measures. Controlling for medical variables and age, patients who coped using greater acceptance and positive reframing at their initial visits reported better one year QOL; those with continued higher levels of these adaptive coping strategies at one year reported better concurrent functional and emotional well‐being. Greater seeking of social support at one year was associated with better concurrent social well‐being and doctor‐patient relationships. In contrast, disengaged coping at study entry was associated with poorer doctor‐patient relationships at one year; continued disengagement at one year was associated with poorer concurrent QOL and greater distress. CONCLUSIONS: During the first year following treatment, QOL and mood improved among both early stage and regionally advanced gynecologic oncology patients. Patients using disengaged coping are particularly at risk for poor QOL and distress. Cancer 2002;94:131–40. © 2002 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.10155

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ovarian cancer survivors often have long-term symptoms such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, fatigue, physical symptoms, reduced health-related quality of life, and a poor outlook.

    “Ovarian cancer (OC) survivors commonly experience chronic symptoms including anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, fatigue, physical symptoms, poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and a generally poor prognosis.”

    From Living Well: Protocol for a web-based program to improve quality of life in rural and urban ovarian cancer survivors (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Patient Characteristics section (page not available in our copy) reports sleep disturbances and low energy at one year, as well as elevated anxiety, depression, and poorer physical and overall quality of life at study entry. But the study includes several gynecologic cancers, not ovarian cancer survivors alone, and reports that mood and quality of life improved over the first year. Its poorer-prognosis description applies to the regionally advanced group, not to ovarian cancer survivors generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Koller M, Kussman J, Lorenz W, Jenkins M, Voss M, Arens E, et al. Symptom reporting in cancer patients. Cancer l996;77: 983-95.
  2. Lutgendorf SK, Anderson B, Larsen K, Buller RE, Sorosky J. Cognitive processing, social support coping, and distress in gynecologic cancer patients. Cancer Res Ther Control l999; 8:123-37.
  3. Lutgendorf SK, Anderson B, Rothrock N, Buller R, Sood AK, Sorosky J. Quality of life and mood in women receiving extensive chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer. Cancer 2000;89:1402-11.
  4. Cella D, Tulsky D, Gray G. Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol l993;11:570-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutgendorf, S. K., Anderson, B., Ullrich, P., Johnsen, E. L., Buller, R. E., Sood, A. K., Sorosky, J. I., & Ritchie, J.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Lutgendorf, Susan K.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12-28
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
131-140
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1979940150
Cited by
142
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
quality of life, mood, gynecologic cancer, coping styles, acceptance, positive reframing, social support seeking, physician-patient relationship, emotional well-being, physical well-being, functional well-being, distress, early-stage cancer, cancer survivors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review