The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The authors compared the performance of screening mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women at genetically high risk for breast cancer. METHODS: The authors conducted an international prospective study of screening mammography and MRI in asymptomatic, genetically high‐risk women age ≥ 25 years. Women with a history of breast cancer were eligible for a contralateral screening if they had been diagnosed within 5 years or a bilateral screening if they had been diagnosed > 5 years previously. All examinations (MRI, mammography, and clinical breast examination [CBE]) were performed within 90 days of each other. RESULTS: In total, 390 eligible women were enrolled by 13 sites, and 367 women completed all study examinations. Imaging evaluations recommended 38 biopsies, and 27 biopsies were performed, resulting in 4 cancers diagnosed for an overall 1.1% cancer yield (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.3–2.8%). MRI detected all four cancers, whereas mammography detected one cancer. The diagnostic yield of mammography was 0.3% (95%CI, 0.01–1.5%). The yield of cancer by MRI alone was 0.8% (95%CI, − 0.3–2.0%). The biopsy recommendation rates for MRI and mammography were 8.5% (95%CI, 5.8–11.8%) and 2.2% (95%CI, 0.1–4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Screening MRI in high‐risk women was capable of detecting mammographically and clinically occult breast cancer. Screening MRI resulted in 22 of 367 of women (6%) who had negative mammogram and negative CBE examinations undergoing biopsy, resulting in 3 additional cancers detected. MRI also resulted in 19 (5%) false‐positive outcomes, which resulted in benign biopsies. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C., & Mulvihill, J. J. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 · Cited by 3,334
Kriege, M., Brekelmans, C. T. M., Boetes, C., Besnard, P. E., Zonderland, H. M., Obdeijn, I. M., Manoliu, R. A., Kok, T., Peterse, H., Tilanus-Linthorst, M. M. A., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa031759 · Cited by 1,687
Warner, E. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.11.1317 · Cited by 1,168
Self-citationAmerican Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
Smith, R. A., Saslow, D., Andrews Sawyer, K., Burke, W., Costanza, M. E., Evans, W. P., Foster, R. S., Hendrick, E., Eyre, H. J., & Sener, S. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141 · Cited by 770
BRCA1 Mutations in Women Attending Clinics That Evaluate the Risk of Breast Cancer
Couch, F. J., DeShano, M. L., Blackwood, M. A., Calzone, K., Stopfer, J., Campeau, L., Ganguly, A., Rebbeck, T., Weber, B. L., Jablon, L., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199705153362002 · Cited by 685
Kuhl, C. K., Schmutzler, R. K., Leutner, C. C., Kempe, A., Wardelmann, E., Hocke, A., Maringa, M., Pfeifer, U., Krebs, D., & Schild, H. H. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap01267 · Cited by 538
Probability of Carrying a Mutation of Breast-Ovarian Cancer Gene BRCA1 Based on Family History
Berry, D. A., Parmigiani, G., Sanchez, J., Schildkraut, J., & Winer, E. (1997) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/89.3.227 · Cited by 380
MRI of Occult Breast Carcinoma in a High-Risk Population
Morris, E. A., Liberman, L., Ballon, D. J., Robson, M., Abramson, A. F., Heerdt, A., & Dershaw, D. D. (2003) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810619 · Cited by 356
BRCA1 MUTATIONS IN WOMEN ATTENDING CLINICS THAT EVALUATE THE RISK OF BREAST CANCER
Ouch, F. E. J. C., Hano, M. I. L. D. E. S., Nne, M. A. A., Athleen, K., Topfer, J. I. S., Ampeau, L. I. C., Ebbeck, T. I. R., & Eber, A. L. W. (1997) · Cited by 256
First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging
Tilanus-Linthorst, M. M. A., Obdeijn, I. M. M., Bartels, K. C. M., de Koning, H. J., & Oudkerk, M. (2000) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1023/a:1006480106487 · Cited by 216
Cited by
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Sardanelli, F., Boetes, C., Borisch, B., Decker, T., Federico, M., Gilbert, F. J., Helbich, T., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Kaiser, W. A., Kerin, M. J., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015 · Cited by 992
Systematic Review: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Warner, E., Messersmith, H., Causer, P., Eisen, A., Shumak, R., & Plewes, D. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00007 · Cited by 564
Self-citationSolin, L. J., Orel, S. G., Hwang, W.-T., Harris, E. E., & Schnall, M. D. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.5448 · Cited by 346
Self-citationSeewaldt, V. L. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/490490a · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehman, C. D., Blume, J. D., Weatherall, P., Thickman, D., Hylton, N., Warner, E., Pisano, E., Schnitt, S. J., Gatsonis, C., Schnall, M., & for the International Breast MRI Consortium Working Group
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-18
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1898-1905
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2088047356
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20971
- The paper
- Lehman, C. D., Blume, J. D., Weatherall, P., Thickman, D., Hylton, N., Warner, E., Pisano, E., Schnitt, S. J., Gatsonis, C., Schnall, M., & for the International Breast MRI Consortium Working Group. (2005). Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
