The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Abstract
Background A sensitive and acceptable screening regimen for women at high risk for breast cancer is essential. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is highly sensitive for diagnosis of breast cancer but has variable specificity. Purpose To summarize the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and posttest probability associated with adding MRI to annual mammography screening of women at very high risk for breast cancer. Data sources English-language literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1995 to September 2007, supplemented by hand searches of pertinent articles. Study selection Prospective studies published after 1994 in which MRI and mammography (with or without additional tests) were used to screen women at very high risk for breast cancer. Data extraction Methods and potential biases of studies were assessed by 2 reviewers, and data were extracted and entered into 2 x 2 tables that compared American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores of MRI plus mammography, mammography alone, or MRI alone with results of breast tissue biopsies. Data synthesis Eleven relevant, prospective, nonrandomized studies that ranged from small single-center studies with only 1 round of patient screening to large multicenter studies with repeated rounds of annual screening were identified. Characteristics of women that varied across study samples included age range, history of breast c…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which is considered the most sensitive test for early detection of breast cancer [33]”
From Screening, Risk Reduction Strategies, and Clinical Management of Unaffected Carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond
Narod, S. A., & Foulkes, W. D. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1431 · Cited by 967
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1001/jama.290.4.465 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.20318 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djj331 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622 · DOI
- Ursin G, 2003, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 12, 332
- Vacek PM, 2004, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 13, 715, 10.1158/1055-9965.715.13.5 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199901143400201 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970215)79:4<761::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2266::AID-CNCR2820761114>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2090 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.924 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.20221 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1260 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.029 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiology.190.2.8284404 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiology.196.3.7644617 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X9301300408 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.4780121403 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.4960 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa031759 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66481-1 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3524 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.292.11.1317 · DOI
- 10.1177/030089160609200609 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.11926 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.20971 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiol.2423051965 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiol.2442060461 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.006 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.21863 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.02.034 · DOI
- 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identification of Breast Cancer Using Integrated Information from MRI and Mammography
Yang, S.-N., Li, F.-J., Liao, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-S., Shen, W.-C., & Huang, T.-C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128404 · Cited by 36
SYNTHESIS OF TAMOXIFEN DERIVATIVES AND THEIR BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES
Tandon, N., Tandon, N., & Tandon, R. (2020) · PLANT ARCHIVES · doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2021.v21.s1.376
Abdel-Razeq, H., & Mansour, R. (2026) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon2692
Metadata
- Authors
- Warner, E., Messersmith, H., Causer, P., Eisen, A., Shumak, R., & Plewes, D.
- Affiliations
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2008-05-06
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 671-679
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2072545903
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Keywords
- breast cancer screening, high-risk women, breast MRI, mammography, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, BRCA1 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, BI-RADS, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, post-test probability, hereditary breast cancer, false positives, annual screening, cost-effectiveness of screening
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammography, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Likelihood Functions, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review