The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population‐based, nested case–control study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Different scoring systems currently are being used to stratify patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) into risk groups. DTC is usually subdivided into papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). The objective of the current study was to identify those factors that predict long‐term unfavorable prognosis and to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the TNM staging system. METHODS: The authors conducted a nested case–control study within the cohort of all patients (n = 5123) diagnosed with DTC in Sweden between 1958–1987 who survived at least 1 year after diagnosis. One control, matched by age at diagnosis, gender, and calendar period, was randomly selected for each case (patients who died of DTC). All patients were classified at the time of diagnosis according to the TNM staging system. The effect of prognostic factors on DTC mortality was evaluated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients with widely invasive FTC experienced a significantly higher mortality compared with PTC patients. The grade of differentiation was found to influence mortality significantly. Patients with TNM Stage IV disease had a higher mortality rate compared with patients with Stage II disease (odds ratio [OR] = 9.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.7–14.6). Patients with lymph node metastases experienced a higher mortality (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6–4.1) and patients with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis were found to have a nearly 7‐fold higher mortality rate (OR = 6.6; 95% CI, 4.1–10.5). Incomplete surgical excision was associated with higher mortality, particularly in patients with Stage I disease. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the following were found to be clinically significant prognostic factors for patients with DTC: histopathologic subgroup, TNM staging including lymph node metastases and distant metastases, and completeness of the surgical excision.Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stack, B. C., Ferris, R. L., Goldenberg, D., Haymart, M., Shaha, A., Sheth, S., Sosa, J. A., & Tufano, F. T. A. T. A. (2012) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2011.0312 · Cited by 277
Dai, W., Jin, X., Han, L., Huang, H., Ji, Z., Xu, X., Tang, M., Jiang, B., & Chen, W. (2020) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-020-02827-w · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundgren, C. I., Hall, P., Dickman, P. W., & Zedenius, J.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-20
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 524-531
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2316678488
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population‐based, nested case–control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21653
- The paper
- Lundgren, C. I., Hall, P., Dickman, P. W., & Zedenius, J. (2006). Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population‐based, nested case–control study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.