Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 652

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population‐based, nested case–control study

Open access
Lundgren, Catharina Ihre, Hall, Per, Dickman, Paul W., Zedenius, Jan·2006·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different scoring systems currently are being used to stratify patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) into risk groups. DTC is usually subdivided into papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). The objective of the current study was to identify those factors that predict long‐term unfavorable prognosis and to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the TNM staging system. METHODS: The authors conducted a nested case–control study within the cohort of all patients (n = 5123) diagnosed with DTC in Sweden between 1958–1987 who survived at least 1 year after diagnosis. One control, matched by age at diagnosis, gender, and calendar period, was randomly selected for each case (patients who died of DTC). All patients were classified at the time of diagnosis according to the TNM staging system. The effect of prognostic factors on DTC mortality was evaluated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients with widely invasive FTC experienced a significantly higher mortality compared with PTC patients. The grade of differentiation was found to influence mortality significantly. Patients with TNM Stage IV disease had a higher mortality rate compared with patients with Stage II disease (odds ratio [OR] = 9.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.7–14.6). Patients with lymph node metastases experienced a higher mortality (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6–4.1) and patients with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis were found to have a nearly 7‐fold higher mortality rate (OR = 6.6; 95% CI, 4.1–10.5). Incomplete surgical excision was associated with higher mortality, particularly in patients with Stage I disease. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the following were found to be clinically significant prognostic factors for patients with DTC: histopathologic subgroup, TNM staging including lymph node metastases and distant metastases, and completeness of the surgical excision.Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.21653

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 652

Metadata

Authors
Lundgren, C. I., Hall, P., Dickman, P. W., & Zedenius, J.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-20
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
524-531
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2316678488
Cited by
652
References
0
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population‐based, nested case–control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21653
The paper
Lundgren, C. I., Hall, P., Dickman, P. W., & Zedenius, J. (2006). Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population‐based, nested case–control study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21653

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.