The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of an inflammation‐based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND.: Recently, it was shown that an inflammation‐based prognostic score, the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), provides additional prognostic information in patients with advanced cancer. The objective of the current study was to examine the value of the GPS compared with established scoring systems in predicting cancer‐specific survival in patients with metastatic renal cancer. METHODS.: One hundred nineteen patients who underwent immunotherapy for metastatic renal cancer were recruited. The Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) score and the Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Comprehensive Prognostic System (MRCCPS) score were calculated as described previously. Patients who had both an elevated C‐reactive protein level (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L) were allocated a GPS of 2. Patients who had only 1 of those 2 biochemical abnormalities were allocated a GPS of 1. Patients who had neither abnormality were allocated a GPS of 0. RESULTS.: On multivariate analysis of significant individual factors, only calcium (hazard ratio [HR], 3.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.51–6.83; P = .002), white cell count (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17–2.35; P = .004), albumin (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.38–5.03; P = .003), and C‐reactive protein (HR, 2.85; 95% CI; 1.49–5.45; P = .002) were associated independently with cancer‐specific survival. On multivariate analysis of the different scoring systems, the MSKCC (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.22–2.88; P = .004), the MRCCPS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.97–2.09; P = .071), and the GPS (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.51–3.67; P < .001) were associated independently with cancer‐specific survival. CONCLUSIONS.: An inflammation‐based prognostic score (GPS) predicted survival independent of established scoring systems in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acute-Phase Proteins and Other Systemic Responses to Inflammation
Gabay, C., & Kushner, I. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902113400607 · Cited by 6,734
Immune changes in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with taxanes
Tsavaris, N., Kosmas, C., Vadiaka, M., Kanelopoulos, P., & Boulamatsis, D. (2002) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600347 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Postdiagnosis C-Reactive Protein and Breast Cancer Survivorship: Findings from the WHEL Study
Villaseñor, A., Flatt, S. W., Marinac, C., Natarajan, L., Pierce, J. P., & Patterson, R. E. (2014) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0852 · Cited by 89
Fankhauser, C. D., Sander, S., Roth, L., Gross, O., Eberli, D., Sulser, T., Seifert, B., Beyer, J., & Hermanns, T. (2018) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.467 · Cited by 80
Jamieson, N. B., Mohamed, M., Oien, K. A., Foulis, A. K., Dickson, E. J., Imrie, C. W., Carter, C. R., McKay, C. J., & McMillan, D. C. (2012) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2370-y · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsey, S., Lamb, G. W. A., Aitchison, M., Graham, J., & McMillan, D. C.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-08
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-212
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2036916233
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of an inflammation‐based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22400
- The paper
- Ramsey, S., Lamb, G. W. A., Aitchison, M., Graham, J., & McMillan, D. C. (2007). Evaluation of an inflammation‐based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.