Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials

Howerton, Mollie W., Gibbons, M. Chris, Baffi, Charles R., Gary, Tiffany L., Lai, Gabriel Y., Bolen, Shari, Tilburt, Jon, Tanpitukpongse, Teerath Peter, Wilson, Renee F., Powe, Neil R., Bass, Eric B., Ford, Jean G.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Providers play a vital role in the successful recruitment of underrepresented patients to cancer clinical trials because they often introduce the opportunity of clinical trials. The purpose of the current systematic review was to describe provider‐related factors influencing recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. METHODS.: To find original studies on the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials, electronic databases from January 1966 to December 2005 were searched; hand‐searched titles in 34 journals from January 2003 to January 2006; and reference lists were examined of eligible articles. Title and abstract reviews were conducted to identify relevant studies. Potential articles were then abstracted using a structured instrument and a serial review process by 2 investigators. RESULTS.: Eighteen studies were eligible for review: 13 targeted healthcare providers, 3 targeted patients/participants, and 2 targeted both providers and patients. The study designs included randomized controlled trial, concurrent controlled trial, case‐control, descriptive, and qualitative. A lack of available protocols and/or a lack of provider awareness about clinical trials prevented providers from discussing the opportunity of clinical trials in 2 studies. In 14 studies, patient accrual was affected by provider attitudinal barriers relating to patient adherence to the study protocol, patient mistrust of research, patient costs, data collection costs, and/or patient eligibility. Providers' communication methods were barriers in 5 studies and promoters in 1 study. CONCLUSIONS.: A heterogeneous body of evidence suggests that several provider‐related factors influence recruitment of underrepresented groups to clinical trials. Future recruitment efforts should address these factors. Cancer 2007;109:465–476. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22436

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Howerton, M. W., Gibbons, M. C., Baffi, C. R., Gary, T. L., Lai, G. Y., Bolen, S., Tilburt, J., Tanpitukpongse, T. P., Wilson, R. F., Powe, N. R., Bass, E. B., & Ford, J. G.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-02
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
465-476
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2075463597
Cited by
184
References
1
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22436
The paper
Howerton, M. W., Gibbons, M. C., Baffi, C. R., Gary, T. L., Lai, G. Y., Bolen, S., Tilburt, J., Tanpitukpongse, T. P., Wilson, R. F., Powe, N. R., Bass, E. B., & Ford, J. G. (2007). Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.