Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are ethnic and racial minority women less likely to participate in clinical trials?

Abstract

Objectives Given the disparity that exists in enrollment of minorities to oncology clinical trials, the objective of our study was to assess whether race is associated with willingness to participate in gynecologic oncology clinical trials in a rural Southern academic medicine setting. Our secondary aim was to determine whether willingness to participate is impacted by an educational intervention.Methods A single institution prospective survey study was performed at an academic medical center. Women presenting to the gynecologic oncology clinic with a current or prior diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy were approached to participate. The validated Attitudes to Randomized Trials Questionnaire (ARTQ) assessed willingness to participate in clinical trials. Relevant demographic and clinical data were abstracted. Characteristics were compared between those willing and unwilling to participate in clinical trials with a chi-square test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous data.Results We enrolled 156 participants (50% White, 50% non-White) from May 2017 to January 2018. The minority group included 35% non-Hispanic Black, 9% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 2% other. Median age was 63 years with endometrial cancer being the most common diagnosis (48%). On initial screen, only 35% were willing to participate in a clinical trial. Willingness to participate did not differ between race, age, marital status, education level, cancer type, stage, or mode of treatment. Rates improved to 82% after being provided additional educational information. Following education, White women and those with more education were significantly more willing to participate in clinical trials than their minority and less educated counterparts.Conclusions Willingness to participate improved among all sub-categories following an educational intervention. The increase in willingness was less robust among racial and ethnic minorities, suggesting that different tools are needed for recruitment of minorities to gynecologic oncology clinical trials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.040

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Patel, S. N., Staples, J. N., Garcia, C., Chatfield, L., Ferriss, J. S., & Duska, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Staples, Jeanine N.
Venue
Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
157
Issue
2
Pages
323-328
ISSN
0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014981905
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Gynecologic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
clinical trial participation, racial and ethnic minorities, minority recruitment, willingness to participate, educational intervention, endometrial cancer, racial disparities
MeSH terms
Aged, Asian, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Endometrial Neoplasms, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are ethnic and racial minority women less likely to participate in clinical trials? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.040
The paper
Patel, S. N., Staples, J. N., Garcia, C., Chatfield, L., Ferriss, J. S., & Duska, L. (2020). Are ethnic and racial minority women less likely to participate in clinical trials? Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.