The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey‐13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND.: Impairments in geriatric domains adversely affect health outcomes of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a key component of the treatment approach for older cancer patients, but it is time consuming. In this pilot study, the authors evaluated the validity of a brief, functionally based screening tool, the Vulnerable Elders Survey‐13 (VES‐13), for identifying older patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with impairment in the oncology clinic setting. METHODS.: Patients with PCa aged ≥70 years who actively were receiving androgen ablation treatment and who were followed within the clinics at the University of Chicago were eligible. Patients self‐completed the VES‐13 and CGA instruments and repeated the VES‐13 1 month later. Physical performance and cognitive assessments were administered by a research assistant. RESULTS.: Of 50 participating patients, 50% were identified as impaired by the VES‐13 (score ≥3). Sixty percent of patients scored as impaired on ≥2 tests within the CGA, exhibiting deficits in multiple domains. The reliability of the VES‐13 (Pearson correlation coefficient) was 0.92. The cut‐off score of 3 on the VES‐13 had 72.7% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for CGA deficits and was highly predictive for identifying impairment (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90). Patients who had mean VES‐13 scores ≥3 performed significantly worse on evaluations of activities of daily living ( P = .001), physical performance ( P = .002), comorbidity ( P = .004), and cognitive impairment ( P = .003). CONCLUSIONS.: Functional and cognitive impairments are highly prevalent among older patients with PCa who receive androgen ablation in oncology clinics. The current results indicated that the brief VES‐13 performed nearly as well as a conventional CGA in detecting geriatric impairment in this population. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85 · Cited by 9,792
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Cited by
The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review
Handforth, C., Clegg, A., Young, C., Simpkins, S., Seymour, M. T., Selby, P. J., & Young, J. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu540 · Cited by 1,048
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer
Extermann, M., & Hurria, A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.10.6559 · Cited by 875
Decoster, L., Van Puyvelde, K., Mohile, S., Wedding, U., Basso, U., Colloca, G., Rostoft, S., Overcash, J., Wildiers, H., Steer, C., et al. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu210 · Cited by 794
Self-citationSoubeyran, P., Bellera, C., Goyard, J., Heitz, D., Curé, H., Rousselot, H., Albrand, G., Servent, V., Jean, O. S., van Praagh, I., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115060 · Cited by 601
Dale, W., Klepin, H. D., Williams, G. R., Alibhai, S. M. H., Bergerot, C., Brintzenhofeszoc, K., Hopkins, J. O., Jhawer, M. P., Katheria, V., Loh, K. P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.00933 · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohile, S. G., Bylow, K., Dale, W., Dignam, J., Martin, K., Petrylak, D. P., Stadler, W. M., & Rodin, M.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-11
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 802-810
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2062905962
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey‐13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22495
- The paper
- Mohile, S. G., Bylow, K., Dale, W., Dignam, J., Martin, K., Petrylak, D. P., Stadler, W. M., & Rodin, M. (2007). A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey‐13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.